Jul 2026· Journal of Communication, Language and Culture· 0 citations
TL;DR
Public responses to teacherless classrooms are shaped by specific ideologies of humanity, morality, labour, and educational authority, demonstrating how public responses to teacherless classrooms are shaped by specific ideologies of humanity, morality, labour, and educational authority.
Abstract
The replacement of teachers by artificial intelligence (AI) has become a critical issue in education. While previous research has focused on educators’ and students’ attitudes and perceptions, this study examines public discourse surrounding teacherless classrooms by analysing 122 Thai-language and 286 English-language comments posted in response to news about the UK’s first “teacherless” classroom, a term used in media coverage. This study employs a three-stage approach consisting of sentiment analysis, corpus-assisted thematic analysis, and critical discourse analysis. The results show that “AI Replacing Teachers” was the most discussed theme, while the overall sentiment was predominantly negative, reflecting fears about the loss of human roles in education. Negative discourse was constructed around three main themes, namely “Lack of Humanity and Ethics in AI Teaching,” “Fears of Dystopia,” and “Job Loss and Unemployment.” The themes reveal a dichotomy between “human” and “non-human,” which can be interpreted in relation to van Dijk’s (1998) Ideological Square. While Thai- and English-language comments shared similar concerns, Thai discourse in this dataset was distinctively constructed through cultural notions of spirit and soul, highlighting moral and spiritual values in education. In contrast, English-language comments tended to normalise AI by comparing it to homeschooling, media labs, and online learning tools. The comparison highlights both shared concerns and specific differences. These findings contribute to research on AI in education by demonstrating how public responses to teacherless classrooms are shaped by specific ideologies of humanity, morality, labour, and educational authority.
Public responses to teacherless classrooms are shaped by specific ideologies of humanity, morality, labour, and educational authority, demonstrating how public responses to teacherless classrooms are shaped by specific ideologies of humanity, morality, labour, and educational authority.
This study reveals the interpersonal functional characteristics of excellent teachers’ classroom discourse in AI-empowered teaching contexts and provides useful references for pre-service English teachers, particularly English education majors, to reflect on and optimize their own discourse practices.
Wen-Huan Sun, Meizhen Liang· Educational and Humanities· 0 citations
It is argued that English language can provide the communicative and terminological foundation for AI literacy, while literature can provide narratives, ethical dilemmas, cultural perspectives, interpretation, critical reading and humanistic reflection through which AI can be understood beyond its technical dimensions.
Dharmeet Singh· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
The study concludes that current literature frequently overlooks the practical integration of AI within traditional, human-centric teaching methodologies and recommends a forward-looking research agenda prioritizing longitudinal, mixed-methods studies and the development of balanced pedagogies that harmonize AI innovat...
Supong Tangkiengsirisin, Le Van Canh, Sethawut Techasan· LEARN Journal : Language Edu...· 0 citations
It is found that classrooms with H-M dual teachers outperform those with human teachers alone, and six types of teacher-AI collaboration have been identified within H-M classrooms.
Juan Dai, H. Husnin, Aidah Abdul Karim· International journal of com...· 0 citations
Results reveal that classroom language is influenced by implicit mental schemas, discursive power relations, and algorithmic mediation, and modality, transitivity and evaluative language indexed authority and transmitted vertical epistemic relations of knowledge.
Iskandarsyah Siregar· Journal of Languages and Lan...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.