Aug 2026· Journal of Orange Technology· Vol 3, pp. 1-12· 0 citations· 52 references
TL;DR
A human centered communication framework is proposed that strengthens trust in AI assisted decision making while promoting more inclusive and responsible technology adoption and contributes to explainable AI research.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in data driven decision making has increased the complexity of analytical models, creating significant communication barriers between technical experts and nontechnical stakeholders. Limited understanding of AI generated insights often reduces trust, delays decision making, and restricts the effective adoption of AI supported recommendations. As organizations increasingly rely on explainable and human centered AI systems, effective communication has become essential to ensuring that AI out- puts are accessible, transparent, and meaningful for diverse stakeholder groups. This study aims to identify the key challenges in communicating complex AI model results and to develop practical communication strategies that enhance human trust among nontechnical stakeholders. A qualitative research design was employed using case studies, open ended surveys, expert interviews, and focus group discussions involving data scientists and nontechnical decision makers from business organizations. The collected data were analyzed through thematic analysis to identify recurring communication barriers and effective explanatory practices. The findings reveal that technical jargon, cognitive overload, and limited contextual explanations are the primary factors reducing stakeholder trust in AI generated insights. Conversely, explainable AI communication supported by intuitive data visualization, contextual storytelling, simplified summaries, and audience centered messaging significantly improves understanding, transparency, and stakeholder confidence across organizational contexts. The study proposes a human centered communication framework that strengthens trust in AI assisted decision making while promoting more inclusive and responsible technology adoption. These findings contribute to explainable AI research by demonstrating how effective communication can bridge the gap between technical complexity and human understanding, thereby generating meaningful humanistic impacts in organizational decision making and sustainable organizational innovation.
The study proposes the Sociotechnical Explainability Alignment (SEA) framework, which conceptualizes ethical XAI as requiring alignment across four levels: design, user, team, and organization.
Hoda Parvaneh Shirazi, A. Al-Asfour, Sami El Ahmadie et al.· Systems· 0 citations
This paper examines the evolving human–AI synergy in Human Resources Management (HRM),
arguing for a shift from automation-centric implementations toward empathy-oriented, augmentative
systems. Building on multidisciplinary sources from management, psychology, and information
systems, we synthesize current theories and...
Diana Ionel Tampu· The International Conference...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that trustworthy AI integration requires addressing pre-existing structural failures before introducing algorithmic decision support, and offer design recommendations for AI-supported appraisal systems, with implications for HCI research and organizational practice.
Andreas Harnindito, Akshat Sawarni· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
A dual perception is revealed in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands, revealing a dual perception in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands.
M. Nakash, E. Bolisani· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
This study provides a novel integration of UTAUT2 with collaboration frameworks, emphasizing the theoretical link between AI adoption, trust, risk and collaboration levels, and contributes to collaboration theory by empirically showing how trust enables, and risk constrains, effective collaborative engagement in remote...
Suman Kumar, M. Moslehpour, A. Walawalkar et al.· Journal of Information, Comm...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.