Skip to content

A Tree-based RAG Framework for Evidence-Intensive QA via Adaptive Planning and Topology-Aware Evidence Gathering

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 15 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work proposes APT-RAG, an Adaptive Planning and Topology-aware evidence gathering RAG framework, which dynamically expands the reasoning structure based on question dependencies and evidence requirements, and introduces evidence-guided batched answer generation to reduce significant generation overhead in evidence-intensive QA.

Abstract

Recent structured RAG methods leverage tree- or graph-based reasoning structures to improve multi-hop QA. However, they face key limitations in evidence-intensive QA, where answering a question requires synthesizing information scattered across dozens or even hundreds of documents: structural rigidity, which limits adaptive reasoning expansion, and topology-ignorant evidence gathering, which prevents effective integration of evidence across different reasoning nodes. To address these issues, we propose APT-RAG, an Adaptive Planning and Topology-aware evidence gathering RAG framework. Adaptive planning dynamically expands the reasoning structure based on question dependencies and evidence requirements, while topology-aware evidence gathering improves evidence coverage through sibling evidence reuse, direct retrieval, and evidence aggregation from child nodes. We further introduce evidence-guided batched answer generation to reduce significant generation overhead in evidence-intensive QA. In the experiments on evidence-intensive QA benchmarks, APT-RAG outperforms existing structured RAG methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/hyudsl/APT-RAG.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Focus on Evidence: Relational-Structure Enhances LLM Effectiveness in TableQA

Table Question Answering (TableQA) requires reasoning over natural language questions and structured tables, and remains challenging due to noisy evidence and complex multi-step reasoning. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based approaches typically adopt decomposition–reasoning–validation pipelines that combine Chain-...

Zhen Yang, Zi-Wei Du, Ming-Han Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MOSAIC: Query-Aware Exploration Policy Adaptation for GraphRAG

Mosaic is presented, a training-free framework that formulates GraphRAG retrieval as a per-query control problem that converts query-specific evidence requirements into a bounded policy over seed selection, graph traversal, stopping, and evidence selection while the corpus graph, indexes, scoring functions, grounding p...

Eunkyeong Lee, Kyeong-Jin Oh, Jinwon Kim et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

LivingRAG: Augmenting Graph RAG with Experience

LivingRAG adds a writable experience store to a graph-based retrieval backbone, enabling verified experiences to be reused during inference in two ways, and analyzes online QA streams and finds reusable signals from shared entities, graph neighborhoods, and question templates.

Yuqing Cui, Zongye Zhang, Qing-Jie Liu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

EvLink: Source-Grounded Evidence Linking for Graph RAG

Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) supports multi-hop reasoning by organizing corpora into structured graphs. However, graph reachability often captures semantic association rather than evidence support, so a reachable passage may still fail to justify a required cross-passage transition. We propose...

Lin-Yao Zheng, Xu-Hang Shi, Zhi-Fang Mao et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.