This work introduces Brain4FMs, the first unified benchmark, to the knowledge, for jointly evaluating BFMs on EEG and iEEG, and conducts exploratory analyses of model-specific properties of spatial, spectral, and discrete representations.
Abstract
Brain foundation models (BFMs) are advancing neurotechnology by learning transferable representations from neural signals, with broad potential in clinical diagnosis and neuroscience research. Their development relies on large-scale pretraining corpora of electrical brain signals, including scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and intracranial EEG (iEEG). However, existing BFM benchmarks primarily focus on EEG, cover only a limited subset of models, and provide limited analysis beyond downstream performance. We introduce Brain4FMs, the first unified benchmark, to our knowledge, for jointly evaluating BFMs on EEG and iEEG. It integrates 17 representative models and 21 public datasets across clinical diagnosis, sleep staging, communication, and affective computing. Brain4FMs is open and plug-and-play, with dataset-aware preprocessing, cross-subject evaluation, heterogeneous multichannel handling, and standardized downstream adaptation workflows. The benchmark reveals performance variation across tasks, signal modalities, and adaptation protocols, with no single BFM consistently dominating all evaluation scenarios. % To better understand these heterogeneous transfer behaviors, we further conduct exploratory analyses of model-specific properties. To better understand these behaviors, we further conduct exploratory analyses of model-specific properties of spatial, spectral, and discrete representations. The code is available at https://github.com/wajtsq/Brain4FMs.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.