Skip to content
Preprint

Exchangeable Testing Against an Unknown Benchmark

Aug 2026 · 1 citation · 37 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

The present work sets up the Bayesian machinery that determines the posterior distribution of the running rank of the benchmark rank in purely combinatorial terms, and results in an explicitly computable predictive probability of winning against a latent benchmark.

Abstract

We generate infinite binary exchangeable sequences by sequential comparison of data points against a latent benchmark. Assuming a prior distribution of the benchmark rank \(R_0\) within an unobserved group, we set up the Bayesian machinery that determines the posterior distribution of the running rank \(R_n\) in purely combinatorial terms. This yields an explicitly computable predictive probability of winning against the benchmark. The normalised running rank converges to a latent strength variable \(X\) with polynomial density, possibly Beta-tilted. Some min-max tournaments lead to particularly simple multiplicative formulae for predictive probabilities related to priors that generalise the Topp--Leone distribution; for that class we analyse the asymptotics of the associated fixed-\(n\) up-down Markov chains. The limiting diffusion has the classical Wright--Fisher variance but a nonlinear drift expressed explicitly via the prior density of the benchmark. Mixtures of Beta densities are classical objects in the theory of exchangeable sequences. The contribution of the present work is the combinatorial rank-based updating mechanism and the resulting explicit predictive laws for sequential testing against an unknown benchmark.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

The Dual-Population Benchmark Model

Motivated by Fisher's and Hill's \cite{Fisher,Hill} ideas of ranking and pivotal quantities, we introduce a planar Poisson process (PPP) model in which the negative component \(\Pi_-\), acted upon by a choice operator {\rm C}, supplies a set of past benchmarks that divide the future points of the positive component \(\...

Alexander Gnedin · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Bessel-Debiased Pseudo-Marginal MCMC for Generalised Bayesian Inference

Sign-Corrected Bessel Debiasing (SCBD), a signed pseudo-marginal method based on independent block estimates of the loss, is introduced and its ordinary-MC and independently randomised quasi-Monte Carlo (RQMC) implementations are studied.

Yingkai Lu, J. Lee, Geoff K. Nicholls · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Majorizing Measures for Canonical Processes with Log-Concave Tails

Let $Y_1,\ldots,Y_n$ be independent symmetric random variables with log-concave tails. We give a dimension-free characterization of the expected supremum of the canonical process $X_x=\sum_{i=1}^n x_iY_i$ without any $\Delta_2$ or regular-growth assumption on the coordinate tails. The characterization is governed by sc...

Xuan-Ang Hu, Han-Chao Wang, Xing-Long Wu · 3 citations · ⚡1
Preprint Sep 2026

Minimax and adaptive inference for branching ratios under long memory

The branching ratio $\rho$ of a self-exciting point process determines the branching margin $1-\rho$ to the critical boundary. We study inference on $\rho$ from a finite record for stationary Hawkes processes with completely monotone kernels whose slow relaxation mass obeys an envelope near zero rate. Slow excitation c...

Mauricio-René Herrera-Marín · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Structure, Not Belief: Correlated Thompson Sampling from LLM-Derived Covariance in Combinatorial Semi-Bandits

Combinatorial Thompson sampling (CTS) draws independent posterior samples for every arm, so its exploration dynamics ignore any relation among arms. We study a minimal change to those dynamics: an LLM is queried once for a partition of the arms, the partition becomes a positive-definite correlation matrix $\Sigma$ thro...

Vikram Kakaria, Anish Kataria, Anany Kotawala · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Scalable Inversion of Contests with Correlated Performances, Including Softmax and Multinomial Probit

Multinomial probit choice probabilities over n alternatives are Gaussian orthant integrals, computed by simulation for thirty years, one expensive integral per alternative. Inversion, which is to say determining item attractiveness consistent with a prescribed choice probability vector, is even more difficult and has b...

P. Cotton · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.