A comprehensive report on the production of endogenous neurosteroids in the brain, the current clinical landscape for the use of neurosteroid-based therapies in psychiatry, and the potential utility of measuring neurosteroidogenesis capacity as a biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illnesses is provided.
Abstract
One of the most significant challenges in treating individuals suffering from psychiatric illnesses is the biological heterogeneity that exists throughout the patient population. This heterogeneity has hindered both timely diagnoses for those impacted as well as the development of new treatment options to combat these disorders. Ongoing efforts have been centered around stratifying individuals based on comprehensive phenotyping; however, biological heterogeneity remains a critical driver of psychiatric illness and poses a significant challenge in the field. Here, we review the current state of the field in biomarker development and the need for personalized medicine in psychiatry. Neurosteroid-based treatments have proven effective for the treatment of postpartum depression, but failed to gain approval for major depressive disorder, likely due to the inability to stratify patients amenable to this treatment approach. We discuss the potential of a biomarker approach to identify individuals with disruption in endogenous neurosteroid synthesis that may have transdiagnostic potential. Exciting emerging studies suggest that a biomarker indicating altered or a reduced capacity for endogenous neurosteroidogenesis would be beneficial for identifying individuals at risk for postpartum depression and could potentially predict treatment response to neurosteroid-based treatments. This review aims to provide a comprehensive report on the production of endogenous neurosteroids in the brain, the current clinical landscape for the use of neurosteroid-based therapies in psychiatry, and the potential utility of measuring neurosteroidogenesis capacity as a biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illnesses.
This Perspective discusses mechanistic approaches that focus on excitation-inhibition balance, reward and aversion circuits, hippocampal-prefrontal neuroplasticity, and processing of social cues, highlighting how these frameworks can elucidate drug mechanisms and predict treatment responses.
Amit Etkin, P. O’Donnell, K. Ressler et al.· Nature reviews. Drug discove...· 0 citations
Neurosteroids and their role in the pathophysiology of perinatal depression have been in the focus of scientific investigation for several decades. Recently, two synthetic analogs of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone—brexanolone and zuranolone—received approval in the United States for the treatment of postpartum depre...
N. Radonjić, K. Moon, K. Deligiannidis· Journal of neuroendocrinolog...· 0 citations
Importance Psychiatric disorders are a major source of disability and premature mortality worldwide. Advances in genomics have clarified parts of their genetic architecture, prompting questions about whether genomic information can inform preventive strategies for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. In this Per...
K. Musliner, Eva C. Schulte, G. Breen et al.· JAMA psychiatry· 0 citations
Abstract Background There is a critical need to change the treatment paradigm for mental disorders by developing interventions that are able to target specific clinical components, alter the disease course and are not merely palliative in intent. A key strategy towards this goal is to focus research on causal pathways...
S. Sundram· International Journal of Neu...· 0 citations
Epilepsy, a neurologically heterogeneous disorder, affects approximately 50 million individuals globally, with a lifetime incidence of around 3 %. For example, in the United States, active epilepsy affects 1.1 % of adults. The disease has a complex biological nature, encompassing genetic factors, molecular-cellular and...
M. Parshenkov, Polina P. Skovorodko, Elizaveta Dorchenko et al.· Scripta Medica· 0 citations