Skip to content
#generative ai Review Open access

Turning Generative AI Policy into Responsible Institutional Practice in Higher Education in Bangladesh

Sep 2026 · HHH Research Blog · 0 citations

TL;DR

This research blog argues that producing an AI policy is only the first step and proposes a comparative research agenda for examining policy coherence and institutional implementation capacity as the conditions through which responsible Generative AI governance can become embedded in everyday university practice.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Generative artificial intelligence is moving rapidly into university teaching, assessment, research and administration, forcing higher education institutions to decide not only whether AI should be used, but how its use should be governed. In Bangladesh, recent evidence points to policy gaps, uneven institutional readiness, fragmented guidance and substantial dependence on instructor discretion. This research blog argues that producing an AI policy is only the first step. The more important governance challenge is whether formal policy is translated into coherent institutional practice through clear rules, leadership responsibility, staff development, communication, infrastructure, review processes and mechanisms for accountability. Drawing on Institutional Theory and recent research in the Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, the blog identifies a need to study the policy-practice relationship across Bangladeshi public and private universities. It proposes a comparative research agenda for examining policy coherence and institutional implementation capacity as the conditions through which responsible Generative AI governance can become embedded in everyday university practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Governing generative AI in digital education: how institutional guidance becomes course-level policy

Course-level AI governance is shaped by the interaction of assessment design, authorship expectations, course purpose, AI adjacency, and instructor discretion, and variation is best understood as an outcome of delegated digital governance whose educational value depends on clarity, justification, and alignment with the...

Evelyn Wu · 1 citation
Open access 2026

AI Literacy and Institutional Governance Response among Leaders in Private Higher Education

Artificial intelligence tools are already in daily use across Zambia's private higher education institutions, yet little is known about whether the leaders responsible for governing that use are equipped to do so, or whether their institutions have built the structures to support them. This paper reports findings from...

Innocent Kumwenda, Joe Likando, M. Malama et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Policy Silence as Governance: AI Decision-Making, Responsibility, and Risk in K–12 Education

Applying Critical Policy Analysis and Jencks’ framework of educational opportunity, the study shows that policy silence is not the absence of governance but a governance choice, one that shapes how access, responsibility, and fairness are determined.

A. Miles, Khalid H. Arar · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Governing Generative Ai in Vietnamese Higher Education: Policy Architecture, Institutional Absence, and The Road To September 2027

Vietnam legislated artificial intelligence faster than almost any comparable middle-income state, moving from a first national AI strategy in 2021 to a standalone Law on Artificial Intelligence in December 2025. Universities occupy an odd position inside the resulting framework. This study asks what Vietnamese AI polic...

Vuong Thanh Long Nguyen · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Governing generative AI in higher education: emerging policy approaches and support ecosystems at innovative U.S. Universities

The findings suggest that academic integrity in the GenAI era is shifting from a primarily punitive model toward a pedagogy-first ecosystem that combines clear expectations, assessment redesign, equitable access to vetted tools, and iterative governance.

Yu-Feng Qian · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.