Skip to content
Open access

Accuracy, Risk, and Translator Agency in AI-Assisted Specialised Translation

Jul 2026 · Arabic Journal for Translation Studies · Vol 5, pp. 37-54 · 0 citations · 13 references

TL;DR

It is argued that computational tools can be used for drafting, terminological support, reformulation, post-editing and quality assessment, but cannot serve as stand-alone authorities in specialised translation.

Abstract

This article discusses the role of human–AI collaboration in specialised translation, focusing on accuracy, risk and translator agency in high-stakes legal, medical, technical, financial and institutional contexts. It critically synthesises recent research on machine translation, large language models, post-editing, terminology management, translation quality and professional agency, using a conceptual and analytical approach. The study does not present primary empirical data; rather, it attempts to establish a framework for assessing machine-generated output within specialised translation workflows. It is theoretically innovative in combining accuracy, risk and agency within a single relational model and demonstrating how each translation decision is shaped by system output, professional judgement and potential consequences. Accuracy is therefore understood as a multidimensional requirement encompassing linguistic, terminological and conceptual precision, as well as consistency, register, genre conventions and functional appropriateness. Risk refers to the potential for output to be inaccurate, incomplete or inadequately validated, resulting in errors that could affect legal interpretation, medical safety, technical procedures, institutional responsibility or end-user decisions. These concepts are presented in a six-dimensional analytical model that includes system contribution, accuracy issue, risk level, translator response, decision rationale and impact on final quality. The article argues that computational tools can be used for drafting, terminological support, reformulation, post-editing and quality assessment, but cannot serve as stand-alone authorities in specialised translation. Translator agency is thus redefined rather than eradicated: the translator must assess, edit or reject system output, explain decisions and take responsibility for the final product. The proposed framework offers a basis for future conceptual, empirical, pedagogical and professional studies.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Beyond Automatic Fluency: Human Agency, Quality Risk and Professional Practice in AI-Assisted Machine Translation

Artificial intelligence has moved machine translation from a specialist technology into an everyday infrastructure for multilingual communication. Neural machine translation and large language models can generate fluent output at remarkable speed, but fluency can conceal errors of meaning, terminology, register, cultur...

Kizito Innocent Lawa · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

DEVELOPMENT OMACHINE TRANSLATION IN MODERN WORLD

This article examines the development of machine translation, its technological evolution, and its role in modern multilingual communication. Particular attention is given to translation accuracy, contextual adequacy, communicative equivalence, and the challenges of representing domain-specific and culturally condition...

Iroda Utayeva · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Semantic-Fidelity Risk in AI-Mediated Revision of Multilingual Academic Abstracts

Artificial intelligence (AI)-mediated revision can improve the fluency and presentability of English-medium academic writing while also altering meaning, method, claim strength, epistemic caution, disciplinary stance, or contribution framing. This mixed-methods study defines semantic-fidelity risk as an unjustified cha...

Mohamad Almashour, Hesham Aldamen, Mutasim Al-Deaibes et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

TRANS 2026

This volume contains abstracts of conference papers by the university professors in the field of applied and theoretical translation studies and linguistics, as well as by translators and interlingual mediators from the European Parliament. The contributions in English and German address the use of artificial intellige...

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Instrumental Competence in Legal Translation: Post-editing Behaviours and Quality of Law and Translation Students

With the development of AI technologies, the boundary between professional and non-professional translators has become increasingly blurred. However, the machine-assisted post-editing behaviours of law and translation students in legal translation remain underexplored. Drawing on Prieto Ramos’ Framework of Legal Transl...

Jin-Xuan Hu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.