The AI-supported UX Strategy Evaluator, created by German UPA’s UX Strategy Working Group, addresses the gap by posing questions to UX strategists and UX managers, rather than attempting to provide answers or best practices.
Abstract
Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) is typically considered an efficiency tool in user experience (UX). Far less attention is paid to its potential to structure reflection. The AI-supported UX Strategy Evaluator, created by German UPA’s UX Strategy Working Group, addresses this gap by posing questions to UX strategists and UX managers, rather than attempting to provide answers or best practices. This paper describes its design principles and development, grounded in the iterative development of a UX strategy checklist to identify which skills, information, and attitudes are relevant for strategic UX work. In addition, it describes a first exploration in a workshop with 13 participants at the conference Mensch & Computer 2025. Initial findings indicate that the question-based approach encourages participants to make assumptions explicit and fosters dialogue. The article concludes with areas for improvement and outlines future work.
This case study examines how technical communication students used generative artificial intelligence in user-experience (UX) design via Figma over a semester, and investigates how students articulate GenAI as object, tool, genre, text, and person.
Gustav Verhulsdonck, Jia-Lei Jiang· Journal of business and tech...· 0 citations
It is concluded that GenAI, when implemented with clear guardrails and institutional integrity, has the potential to elevate advancement from an operational function to a strategic, mission-aligned partner in shaping the future of higher education.
Liz Hawkins· Journal of Education Advance...· 0 citations
These findings show that participants configured proactive support through prospective planning, used suggestions for both idea generation and self-monitoring, and valued lightweight visual representations alongside non-directive rhetorical framing for non-intrusive interventions.
Chao Zhang, Abe Davis, Chih-Wei Chen et al.· 1 citation
Findings indicate that explicit use of GST in AIEd remains limited, whereas systemic perspectives appear mainly through complexity, feedback, adaptation, sociotechnical interaction and educational transformation.
Dimitra Kapousizi, Theodoros I. Kosmanis· Systems research and behavio...· 0 citations
This paper presents a structured approach to integrating AI tutors into undergraduate computer architecture courses at a medium-sized Hispanic-Serving Institution. We propose a system in which AI functions as a scaffolded learning partner designed to promote articulation, reflection, and independent reasoning, rather t...
Alberto Cruz, Anjana Yatawara, Maruti V. Mishra et al.· CoED· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping teacher education, raising new questions about how reflective and reflexive practice can support teachers’ professional identity, and pedagogical decision‑making in AI‑mediated environments. This study conducts a rapid review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, analysing 54 pu...
A. Balula· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
