Aug 2026· International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)· pp. 2184-2187· 0 citations
Abstract
: Meaning is one of the most fundamental yet complex problems in linguistic theory. The question of what a linguistic expression means has generated diverse approaches, ranging from reference and sense to use, context and cognition. Modern linguistic thought has progressively moved beyond the assumption that meaning is reducible to the relationship between a word and an external object. Frege's distinction between sense and reference, Wittgenstein's emphasis on use, Austin's analysis of language as action, and contemporary cognitive approaches have progressively foregrounded the roles of context, conceptualization, experience and cognition in meaning. The Indian śāstric traditions developed a sophisticated analysis of linguistic meaning through the concepts of śabda, artha, śakti, abhidhā, lakṣaṇā, tātparya, vākyārtha and śābdabodha. Nyāya, Mīmāṃsā and Vyākaraṇa approached the problem from distinct philosophical perspectives, while Bhartṛhari's Vākyapadīya offers an especially comprehensive account connecting language, meaning and cognition. This paper undertakes a comparative examination of these approaches. Rather than equating concepts belonging to different intellectual traditions, it investigates the semantic problems addressed by them and argues that a movement from reference to cognition provides a productive framework for understanding meaning as a dynamic phenomenon involving linguistic expression, context, interpretation and consciousness.
The present study explores the role of cognitive linguistics in English-Arabic translation, with particular attention to conceptual metaphor theory, frame semantics, and embodied cognition as key cognitive mechanisms underlying the processes of meaning construction and reconstruction. It critically challenges tradition...
Marvet Abed Ahmad Hmaidan· World Journal of English Lan...· 0 citations
Meaning constitutes the foundation of language, shaping both its structure and interpretation.
Among its various dimensions, conversational meaning is central, arising not solely from lexical
content but from the interaction of speaker intention, context, and pragmatic function. Unlike literal
meaning, which is relativ...
S. Lenka· Applicable Nonlinear Analysi...· 0 citations
Pragmatics represents a vital extension of modern linguistics, transcending the formal structural boundaries of the sentence to enter the realm of live communication among language users. The significance of this field lies in its ability to explain how discourse meets the needs of human interaction, conveying the spea...
Mohammed Al-Khaqani, Haider Al-Shaibani· Nanar Journal for Humanities...· 0 citations
Within the framework of the modern cognitive and discursive paradigm of linguistic knowledge, this article investigates the mental and pragmatic mechanisms underlying the functioning of gerundial constructions in the position of verbal complementation. Drawing on data from representative synchronous English corpora (Br...
O. P. Ryabko· Current Issues in Philology...· 0 citations
This study aims to elucidate the communicative and social dimensions in Al-Jāḥiẓ's linguistic thought (d. 255 AH/868 CE) and reassess them within contemporary scholarship, transcending exclusive reliance on Western theoretical frameworks. Adopting an analytical-comparative approach, it examines selected passages from K...
This study investigates how Early Modern English grammarians approached the category of interjections, tracing its inheritance and adaptation from Latin grammatical traditions, which first introduced the concept into Western linguistic thought. The analysis draws on data from the
Early Modern English Grammars Arch...
M. Bagli· English Language and Linguis...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.