This review integrates recent mechanistic insights into UPR-driven tumor progression, including pathway crosstalk, immune regulation, and immunotherapy resistance, with advances in small-molecule inhibitors, while critically evaluating their therapeutic potential and translational challenges in cancer treatment.
Abstract
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, triggered by the accumulation of misfolded proteins, activates the unfolded protein response (UPR) to restore protein homeostasis. Dysregulated ER stress responses have emerged as critical modulators of cancer progression and immune escape, influencing the initiation, development and maintenance of antitumor immunity. The UPR is mediated by three principal sensors—PERK, IRE1α, and ATF6—each operating at distinct regulatory levels to coordinate translational reprogramming, RNA processing, and transcriptional reprogramming. Through these mechanisms, ER stress promotes malignant progression, tumor growth, and metastasis, while excessive activation can instead trigger cell death. Given this context-dependent duality, pharmacological targeting of the UPR has emerged as a promising anticancer strategy. For instance, IRE1α inhibitors block XBP1 splicing and RIDD-mediated immune escape, PERK inhibitors and ISR modulators reverse chemoresistance, ATF6-targeted strategies modulate ATF6-dependent tumor growth and treatment responses, and chemical chaperones exhibit both cytoprotective and antitumor effects depending on tumor context. This review integrates recent mechanistic insights into UPR-driven tumor progression, including pathway crosstalk, immune regulation, and immunotherapy resistance, with advances in small-molecule inhibitors, while critically evaluating their therapeutic potential and translational challenges in cancer treatment.
How cells balance this tightrope between adaptation and cell death in the context of cancer is dissected, and how UPR signaling drives angiogenesis, metastasis, immune-evasion, and chemoresistance is explored before finally discussing its therapeutic potential.
This review summarizes how the three canonical UPR branches establish a persistent adaptive state under chronic ER stress and discusses the molecular mechanisms by which UPR signaling maintains proteostasis, reprograms cellular metabolism, alleviates oxidative stress, and coordinates autophagy.
Zihe Zhou· Theoretical and Natural Scie...· 0 citations
The molecular frameworks by which ATF4 integrates stress signals from the endoplasmic reticulum, oxidative stress, and nutrient deprivation to orchestrate metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion are dissected.
Zhiying Peng, Tong Xu, Z. Xia et al.· iScience· 0 citations
Targeting XBP1 may enhance the efficacy of existing therapies, particularly immune checkpoint blockade, by alleviating MDSC-mediated immunosuppression, offering a novel paradigm for understanding and reversing tumor immune escape.
Ziwei Chen, Jiaqi Wu, Wen-Xi Liu et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Nanocarrier-mediated co-delivery of genetic and epigenetic agents offers a convergent strategy to simultaneously reprogram UPR signaling and correct epigenetic aberrations, thereby achieving superior therapeutic outcomes in ERS-driven diseases compared with single-modality approaches.
Current evidence is brought together to provide a comprehensive understanding of how CMA contributes to the Hallmarks of Cancer, including sustained proliferative signaling, resistance to cell death, metabolic reprogramming, invasion and metastasis, immune evasion, and the enabling characteristics of genome instability...
Meenakshi Tiwari, Lokendra Kumar Sharma, Bandana Chakravarti et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.