Skip to content

Sharp Minimax Regret for Infinite-Memory Logistic Prediction

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 39 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work determines the minimax cumulative log-loss regret of a finite-alphabet, exogenously driven source with genuinely infinite input memory, and shows memory decay cannot determine regret, and that a profile-scaled online Newton predictor attains $O_B(\Gamma_T(r)$ in polynomial time per round.

Abstract

We determine the minimax cumulative log-loss regret of a finite-alphabet, exogenously driven source with genuinely infinite input memory: independent Rademacher inputs $(U_t)$ are observed sequentially and the next binary mark has logit $\sum_{j\ge1}\theta_jU_{t+1-j}$, the unknown coefficients obeying a summable envelope $|\theta_j|\le r_j$, $\sum_jr_j\le B$. At horizon $T$, lag $j$ can move the logit by at most $r_j$ and is exercised in only $n_{T,j}=(T-j+1)_+$ rounds, and the two limitations combine into the sum $\Gamma_T(r)=\sum_{j\le T}\log(1+n_{T,j}r_j^{2})$. One coordinate-localised Bayesian mixture achieves $R_T(r)\le C\Gamma_T(r)$ for \emph{every} summable envelope with $C$ universal. Our main result is a matching nonasymptotic converse for the canonical exponential and polynomial envelopes; its new ingredients are a modular finite-sample information bound for logistic experiments with an exogenous random design, and a conditioning estimate for the overlapping Toeplitz lag matrix obtained by exhibiting each off-diagonal Gram sum as a sum of independent Rademacher variables indexed by the edges of a forest, needing neither local asymptotic normality nor any spectral theorem for random Toeplitz matrices. So $\Gamma_T(r)$ is the minimax regret scale here, giving $\Theta(\alpha^{-1}\log^{2}T)$ for $r_j=Ae^{-\alpha j}$ and $\Theta(T^{1/(2s)})$ for $r_j=Aj^{-s}$, $s>1$ --- the latter without the extra $(\log T)^{1-1/(2s)}$ factor any window-truncation analysis pays. We also show memory decay cannot determine regret, and that a profile-scaled online Newton predictor attains $O_B(\Gamma_T(r))$ in polynomial time per round.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Parameter-Free Interval-Dynamic Regret under Heavy-Tailed Noise

We study online convex optimization with one unbiased stochastic subgradient per round and an unknown finite conditional $p$th noise moment, $1<p\le2$. For every fixed interval $I$ of length $n$ and comparator path with $\Lambda_I=1+P_I/D$, one learner achieves \[ E[Regret_I(u)]\le\min(GDn, C[GD\sqrt{n(\Lambda_I+\log^2...

Vaneet Aggarwal · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

One Spectrum, Two Resources: Data-Memory Scaling in Autoregressive Prediction

The minimax law is proved, showing that the two resources are governed by one predictive-energy spectrum in a positive-entropy autoregressive retrieval source and giving exponent-adaptive allocation, finite-precision realization, and compute-precision laws under two-sided arithmetic assumptions.

Chi-Wun Yang, Xiao-Yu Li · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

A positive resolution of the gap-entropy conjecture

We prove the gap-entropy conjecture for fixed-confidence best-arm identification with independent unit-variance Gaussian arms, means in $[0,1]$, and a unique optimal arm. For each suboptimal arm $i$, let $\Delta_i=\mu_*-\mu_i$ be its gap from the optimal mean, and write $H=\sum_{i\ne *}\Delta_i^{-2}$. Let $p_r$ be the...

P. M. Aronow, Nathan Kallus, Patrick Lopatto · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Sequential Euclidean connections with exponential memory: distributional performance and adversarial robustness

Comparison with the running mean highlights the stationary insertion-length distribution, its time-homogeneous update, stationary coefficient profile, and fixed effective memory, and its time-homogeneous update, stationary coefficient profile, and fixed effective memory.

P. D. de Castro · 1 citation · ⚡1
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Bandits with Probing: Optimal Regret and the Limits of Winner Feedback

A learner probes at most $k$ of $n$ arms each round, receives the maximum of their rewards in $[0,1]$, and competes with the best fixed arm. When does the probing advantage pay for learning? We determine two minimax laws. Under independent stochastic rewards with winner feedback (the maximum and a winning label), or on...

Yong-Jie Guan · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Generalized Linear Bandits with Memory

This analysis provides a unified treatment of memory-induced non-stationarity and nonlinear link functions, while ensuring that the leading regret term is independent of the curvature of the link function.

Heesang Ann, Hyunjun Choi, Taehyun Hwang et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.