A new private instantiation of the Bayesian bootstrap using a blocking strategy, which gives competitive private uncertainty quantification and improves over private Bayesian alternatives that require a specified data-generating model in common settings.
Abstract
With AI systems gaining more access to individuals'information, it is important to protect privacy when reporting statistical answers. Equally important is to privatize the reporting of uncertainty in such answers. To this end, we adopt a Bayesian likelihood-free framework and make simulation from the posterior private. In particular, we propose a new private instantiation of the Bayesian bootstrap using a blocking strategy. Rather than assigning idiosyncratic random weights to each individual, we randomly group individuals and assign a single weight to each group. By concealing individuals'contributions within a group, we fortify differential privacy gates. We harness amortized inference that decouples private learning from posterior sampling. A push-forward map from observation weights to posterior samples is learned privately by adding calibrated noise during training. Subsequent posterior draws require no additional privacy and computation budget. We call the resulting method the Private Generative Bayesian Bootstrap (PGBB). We establish a differential privacy guarantee, analyze convergence to the non-private blocked-bootstrap target, and quantify the discrepancy between the ordinary and blocked Bayesian-bootstrap posteriors. In addition, we derive data-free tuning of the block Dirichlet concentration parameter that restores posterior dispersion asymptotically. We also show a single fit of PGBB can support a family of loss-based decision rules simultaneously without additional privacy cost. In simulations and in applications to U.S. Census returns to schooling and U.S. natality birthweight quantiles, PGBB gives competitive private uncertainty quantification and improves over private Bayesian alternatives that require a specified data-generating model in common settings.
The findings suggest that the inferential privacy guarantees provided by differentially private mechanisms may be substantially stronger in practice than what is implied by the theoretical upper limit.
Jan Reiter Sørensen, H. S. Christensen, Rasmus Rask Kragh Jørgensen et al.· 0 citations
Private Inference-Time Pessimism (PrivITP) is introduced, which combines $\chi^2$-regularized rejection sampling with a two-phase Gaussian mechanism, and achieves ex-post $(\epsilon,\delta)$-DP with a privacy cost independent of the number of responses, cleanly decouples the regularization parameter from the privacy pa...
I. Jain, Nandini Bhattad, Sayak Ray Chowdhury· 0 citations
These contributions are extending PAC privacy to autoregressive generation, handling adaptive self-generated contexts, and introducing coupled decoding that preserves privacy accounting while avoiding greedy degeneration.
Mina Mirzadehsarcheshmeh, Amir Keyvan Khandani· 1 citation
Statistical agencies increasingly rely on small area estimation to produce reliable estimates for subpopulations with limited sample sizes. These estimates are built from individual survey responses, so agencies must ensure that releasing them does not reveal information about any single respondent. We show that when a...
Together, these results give a substitution map for privacy accounting: when Poisson-based computations remain sound for structured participation, where they fail, and what sound alternatives cost in deployment.
Xu-Jun Che, Depeng Xu· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.