Skip to content

How Far Do Capability Cues Travel? Anthropomorphism and Differentiated Trust in a Platform-Embedded AI Assistant

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 51 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

These findings separate interface effects from relationships among users' perceptions and show why ability, integrity, and benevolence should be evaluated separately.

Abstract

Visible AI capabilities need not translate into broader judgments of trustworthiness. In a randomized 2 x 2 experiment with 270 U.S.-based Reddit users, an embedded assistant displayed one or three functions, with or without a brief rationale. Displaying three functions increased perceived multifunctionality; no other randomized main effect survived correction across the six outcomes. Rationale availability did not reliably increase perceived intelligence. Exploratory analysis indicated stronger uptake of the functional display at higher objective AI literacy. Among concurrently measured judgments, perceived multifunctionality was associated with perceived intelligence, which was associated with anthropomorphism and all three trust dimensions. After accounting for perceived intelligence, anthropomorphism was positively associated with benevolence, but not reliably with integrity or ability. These findings separate interface effects from relationships among users'perceptions and show why ability, integrity, and benevolence should be evaluated separately.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Perceived Anthropomorphism as a Mediating Mechanism in Human–AI Interaction: Explaining Empathy, Trust, and Perceived Value in Higher Education

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly evaluated as both a functional technology and a socially responsive interaction partner. This study examines how academic staff form trust in educational AI and how that trust contributes to perceived value. Its central contribution is to position perceived anthropomorphism...

Mohammed Al-Mamari, Abdullah Al-Abri · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Wired to believe: source-authority cues shape perceived AI capability and neural persuasion.

AI advisors support judgement, yet users rely on credibility cues when evaluating AI-generated advice. Using fNIRS and behavioural measures, we examined associations of source-authority cues with perceived AI capability, judgement updating, and prefrontal processing. Seventy adults evaluated food-safety rumours before...

Yi Ding, Zi-Yan Deng, Wengang Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

The Social Intelligence Reliance Halo: Perceived Social Understanding, Epistemic Trust, and Reliance Quality in Human–AI Decision Making

As generative AI systems become more socially responsive, personalized, and perspective-aware, a central question is whether such features improve human–AI decision quality or simply make AI advice more influential. This study introduces the Social Intelligence Reliance Halo as a proposed social-to-epistemic spillover...

Filiz Mızrak, Ayca Can Ozer Kirgiz, H. Demirel · 0 citations
Conference

Trust Calibration in AI: The Role of Transparency and User Performance

A pilot study was conducted to investigate whether trust and reliability in an object detection system could be predicted by factors related to system transparency, user performance, and familiarity with AI technology. We examined the impact of perceived transparency—measured by the total number of clicks to access mor...

Virginia Sullivan, Kristin Weger, Vineetha Menon et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Sure of themselves, not yet beholden: Motivation, trust, and generative AI reliance in higher education.

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) becomes embedded in higher education, a troubling pattern has surfaced. Some students increasingly delegate thinking, judgment, and task completion to AI, and such reliance can quietly erode the very capacities-independent reasoning, learner autonomy, and critical engagement-t...

Yun-Fei Du, Yu-Hui Zeng, Chao-Yu Guo et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.