Aug 2026· Vaccine· Vol 90, pp.
129043
· 0 citations· 19 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A lower likelihood of subsequent COVID-19 booster uptake after experiencing systemic AE, particularly when severe or prolonged, or when experiencing a severe local AE is found, underscore the need to address experienced AE in communication strategies, as this may influence the success of vaccination campaigns.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to assess whether the occurrence, severity, and duration of AE following COVID-19 booster vaccination were associated with subsequent booster uptake during the 2022-2024 autumn booster campaigns in the Netherlands.
Methods
We included participants from the Vaccine Study COVID-19 (VASCO), an ongoing prospective cohort study, who were eligible for booster vaccination in 2022-2024. Participants completed a questionnaire on AE one month after booster vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between the occurrence, severity, and duration of local and systemic AE, and revaccination during the subsequent year. We adjusted for demographics and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Results
In 2022 and 2023, 11,010 and 14,824 participants were vaccinated and completed the AE questionnaire. Of these, 73.7% and 87.0% were revaccinated in subsequent years. The occurrence of systemic AE in 2022 was associated with a lower odds of revaccination in 2023 (OR: 0.84 [95%CI, 0.76-0.93]). The likelihood of revaccination declined with increasing severity- moderate (0.79 [0.66-0.94]) and severe AE (0.45 [0.34-0.60]) - and longer duration (>5 days: 0.72 [0.54-0.95]) of systemic AE. Also, severe local AE (0.38 [0.23-0.60]) and seeking medical care for AE (0.50 [0.34-0.73]) were associated with reduced vaccination uptake. Similar associations were observed for revaccination in 2024.
Conclusion
This study found a lower likelihood of subsequent COVID-19 booster uptake after experiencing systemic AE, particularly when severe or prolonged, or when experiencing a severe local AE. These findings underscore the need to address experienced AE in communication strategies, as this may influence the success of vaccination campaigns.
It is found that COVID-19 vaccination was protective against Long COVID, and a significant waning of this protection within seven months after vaccination was observed.
Z. Butzin-Dozier, Yunwen Ji, Lin-Chiun Wang et al.· EBioMedicine· 0 citations
The findings highlight that adolescent vaccination impact depends on the timing/speed of implementation, other present intervention strategies, and the status of the epidemic at the time and it should not be considered as a stand-alone immunisation strategy.
A. Fairweather, B. Swallow, R. Stuart et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
The most commonly reported long-term adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination were chronic fatigue, cognitive impairment, and menstrual irregularity.
The need for stronger, sustainably financed adult immunization platforms and associated monitoring systems to enhance life-course vaccination benefits and to support future outbreak, epidemic, and pandemic responses is underscored.
D. Brooks, A. Germann, L. Craw et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
A fourth dose of a mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was effective against SARS-CoV2 infection related death and hospitalisation, however, effectiveness waned over time.
Xin-Tong Li, N. Mercadé-Besora, Amy Shuk Man Lam et al.· Journal of Infection· 0 citations
Men were significantly more than twice as likely to receive the booster dose compared to females, while individuals who had positive attitudes toward the booster dose were up to 5 times more likely to be vaccinated.
Mohammed J. Almalki, Amani A. Alotaibi· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.