The results show that Dependence on AI significantly and positively predicts employees’ innovative behavior, and cognitive flexibility plays a partial mediating role between the two variables.
Abstract
Drawing upon the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study explores the mechanism through which Dependence on AI affects employees’ innovative behavior, focusing on the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and the moderating role of job complexity. Using questionnaire data from full-time employees collected between December 2024 and February 2025, this study conducts confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, hierarchical regression and the Bootstrap test with AMOS, SPSS and the PROCESS macro. The results show that Dependence on AI significantly and positively predicts employees’ innovative behavior, and cognitive flexibility plays a partial mediating role between the two variables. Job Complexity serves as a negative moderator for the association between Cognitive Flexibility and Innovative Behaviors, and the positive linkage of Cognitive Flexibility to Innovative Behaviors becomes relatively weaker when Job Complexity is high. This study expands the cognitive mediating path through which Dependence on AI influences innovative behavior, refines the theoretical boundary of demand–resource interaction in the JD-R model, and provides practical implications for organizations to rationally guide human–machine collaboration and enhance employees’ innovative ability in intelligent scenarios.
The findings of this study could help bank executives, human resource managers, and policymakers understand the importance of human-focused implementation of AI, ongoing AI skill-building, and favorable organizational practices that boost employee satisfaction and innovation.
Employee innovative behavior is an important micro-level source of organizational competitiveness. Grounded in conservation of resources (COR) theory, with the job demands–resources (JD–R) model specifying the complementary motivational process, this study examines how PsyCap is associated with innovative behavior and...
Grounded in the framework proposed by Schaufeli and Bakker (2004), this study examines job resources at the task level (role clarity and job autonomy), the interpersonal level (managerial feedback and teamwork) and the organizational level (learning and development opportunities and access to resources). Through th...
Edibe Özbay, Muhammed Bugrahan Hatiboglu, Yonca Gürol· Central European Management...· 0 citations
Drawing upon social identity theory and social exchange theory, this study aims to examine the underlying mechanism through which psychological safety (PS) enhances employee creativity, focusing on the serial mediating effects of organizational identification and employee voice behavior.
A quantitative metho...
Hoan Thanh Dang, Giang Thị Hương Vũ, A. Nguyen· Journal of Asia Business Stu...· 0 citations
This study examines how learning orientation, knowledge sharing, employee motivation, and leadership reputation relate to employee performance, with creative behavior as an arbitrator and incentive as an intermediary. A correlational design that is quantitative was applied using PLS-SEM in SmartPLS 4. Questionnaire dat...
M. I. Anshori, Hosnaidah, Sri Hartatik et al.· Fundamental and Applied Mana...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.