Nov 2026· Journal of Hydraulic Engineering· 0 citations· 30 references
Abstract
Predicting river flow is important for flood management, river erosion protection, navigability update, and so on. The traditional approach to predicting the flow using a hydrodynamic model (HM) requires manual calibration and recalibrations of uncertain parameters; it has faced inefficiency and uncertainty issues. This study aims to explore assimilating observational data of water level and velocity into the HM as a new approach to predicting open-channel flow. The background of this study is that ever advancing technologies for flow monitoring have offered or will soon offer good amounts of data in real time, making data assimilation (DA) practical. The new approach’s novelty lies in combining hydrodynamic laws (via the momentum principle) with data during HM run time without the need for calibrations and optimizing the prediction accuracy while minimizing computing costs. Its performance is validated using observational data from flume experiments and hydrometric stations in the Danube River. The results show that the adaptive proportional–integral–derivative–based DA technique is more efficient than the model-predictive-controller-based DA technique, enhancing the computation efficiency by an order of magnitude. Both techniques automate the correction of the channel-bed friction factor itself, which may also alleviate the impact of other uncertain parameters on the prediction. Both techniques have achieved low relative errors (
<
1
%
). The sequential selection method successfully locates optimal DA stations in the channel, supported by open-channel flow theories. The new approach improves the flow prediction for the entire HM channel. This study has contributed to the development of a robust framework for forecasting open-channel flow in real time.
Global Hydrological Models (GHMs) are an invaluable tool for simulating the dynamics of our freshwater cycle and estimating its contribution to sea level rise. However, uncertainties of input data (e.g., meteorological forcing, water demand estimates) and empirical parameters, as well as errors in the model structure (...
M. Schumacher, Çağatay Çakan, Supriya Tiwari et al.· GRACE/GRACE-FO Science Team...· 0 citations
Lumped hydrological modeling approaches based on the Rational Method (RM) continue to be used in engineering practice despite the advent of various sophisticated hydrological modeling tools in the past decades. While the simplicity, low data requirements, and intuitiveness of the RM explain its longevity, many simplify...
T. Guillot, José G. Vasconcelos, Xing Fang· Hydrology· 0 citations
Accurate determination of groundwater flow velocity (GFV) is essential for resource management and contamination control. The single-well push–pull (SWPP) test is widely used for GFV estimation due to its cost effectiveness, but its accuracy is influenced by operational and hydrogeological factors. This study conduct...
Ke-Han Yuan, Qi Zhu, Kai-Xuan Lan et al.· Journal of hydrologic engine...· 0 citations
Flood forecasting often depends on upstream hydrographs that are unavailable, incomplete, or unreliable. Reverse Flood Routing (RFR) addresses this gap by reconstructing upstream inflows from downstream observations, yet its operational use remains limited by numerical instability, observational uncertainty, and the il...
To improve the predictive accuracy of numerical simulations for ventilated cavitating flows, this study presents a data assimilation framework based on the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) to calibrate four key parameters in a large eddy simulation model for an axisymmetric body: the Smagorinsky constant, the number of sm...
Yuanzhe Wang, Liang Hao, Tao-Tao Liu et al.· The Physics of Fluids· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.