A conceptual 5D framework is proposed that offers a structured way to understand ChatGPT integration as a broader institutional process that requires preparation, educational alignment, policy direction, support during implementation, and ongoing review over time.
Abstract
The rapid spread of ChatGPT in higher education has created growing pressure on institutions to respond to generative AI in ways that are both educationally meaningful and institutionally responsible. Although existing research increasingly shows that ChatGPT can support student learning and academic performance, these benefits are not automatic and depend on how the tool is used and guided. At the same time, current literature on ChatGPT integration remains fragmented, with most studies focusing separately on pedagogical adaptation, policy and governance, or technology adoption. This study addresses this gap by proposing a conceptual 5D framework for ChatGPT integration in higher education. The framework was developed through literature synthesis and theoretical grounding, drawing on UTAUT, TPACK, Bloom’s Taxonomy, TIM, Innovation Resistance Theory, Responsible AI Governance, and the PDCA continuous improvement model. The proposed framework includes five connected dimensions: Readiness, Pedagogical Integration, Change and Resistance, Governance and Policy, and Monitoring and Improvement. The main contribution of the study is to organize these dimensions into one coherent institution-level framework rather than treating them as separate responses. The framework offers a structured way to understand ChatGPT integration as a broader institutional process that requires preparation, educational alignment, policy direction, support during implementation, and ongoing review over time.
A conceptual framework for integrating ChatGPT into the informatics curriculum to support AI-augmented learning in secondary education and serves as a tutor, assistant, and evaluator, supporting more interactive and student-centered learning experiences.
Amidst these international changes we are witnessing in higher education, AI and vibe coding are progressively being adopted as a part of pedagogy. Vibe coding (a concept that appeared in 2025) challenges educators to think about its role in shaping the future of education and the further development of AI-driven instr...
S. Meruert, A. Turdybek· Bulletin of Toraighyrov Univ...· 0 citations
Teachers must, in one way or another, address issues of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GAI). The urgency became even more acute when the chatbot ChatGPT was launched in November 2022, changing the conditions for teaching and learning in schools, creating tensions within the educational system. The...
U. Bergmark, Caroline Graeske, Sara Viklund· European Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
The research reflects cautious optimism about ChatGPT’s pedagogical value, acknowledging both its educational benefits and challenges while underscoring the essential role of usability and learner attitudes in fostering sustained artificial intelligence utilization in higher education.
I. Asampana, Henry Akwetey Matey, B. Ocra et al.· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The findings indicate that while teachers and students recognize the benefits of digital learning, major challenges such as limited infrastructure, inadequate digital literacy, and unstable internet access hinder effective implementation and there is strong interest in adopting Google Sites for PjBL, provided adequate...
This study explores teachers’ attitudes towards the adoption of ChatGPT as a learning technology, focusing on its potential benefits, limitations and implications for education and can assist policymakers, educators and technology developers in collaborating to implement practical and ethical AI-enabled tools like Chat...
Latifa Alzahrani· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.