Skip to content

UMOSU/UMOKWAI — Foundational Phenomena and Domains of Complexity: What an AI Needs to Answer Reliably

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

AbstractUMOSU/UMOKWAI — Foundational Phenomena and Domains of Complexity: What an AI Needs to Answer Reliably**This deposit collects the first systematic, phenomenon-by-phenomenon analysis conducted within the UMOSU/UMOKWAI ontological and epistemic-operational model. The model classifies reality through six foundational phenomena (fA1, fA2, fB1, fB2, fC1, fC2) and two domains of complexity (D1, D2), each defined by a configuration of parameters (Su, Og, Re, Sh, Rc, Fw). The eight documents published here descend from the general level of the classification to the operational one, asking for each phenomenon: what are its real correspondents, which sub-cases compose it, what type of source or authority is competent to verify it, and what an artificial intelligence system concretely needs in order to answer reliably about it.The work brings out results not visible at the model's general level: a three-entry taxonomy of the type of control available (reference source, single-case expert, proper Domain Specialist) applicable to all phenomena; a recurring pattern — and in one case predicted by the model — linked to the presence of an authority with legal power of intervention; a multi-level distinction of control (physical, verification, validation) for phenomena with an intentional component; a recursive problem — "who verifies the verifier" — that takes different forms depending on the phenomenon, resolved in a particularly favourable way in the case of logical-formal demonstration; the absence of an authority responsible for the synthesis in combinatorial phenomena; and a concluding principle according to which a large language model acts as an interface toward an external source of verification, never as a source itself.A presentation document accompanies the collection, listing the discoveries in summary form and fixing their status as a basis for implementation in the ontological Router of the UMOSU-UMOKWAI Modular Ruleset system.This is the English-language publication of the eight documents, following the first publication in Italian.Keywords: UMOSU, UMOKWAI, ontology, operational epistemology, knowledge classification, hallucination prevention, artificial intelligence, reference source, Domain Specialist, ontological Router, falsifiability.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.