Reflections and Recommendations on AI Adoption Practice from a Mixed-Ability Research Group
TL;DR
Qualitative analysis of interviews of the five members of the mixed-ability research team discusses the motivations, challenges, and practices surrounding the use of generative AI in the lab to promote AI workflow adoption while preserving agency and disability identity.
Abstract
Generative AI tools have recently been rapidly adopted by academics in mixed-ability research teams for both personal and professional tasks. While previous work on adoption of AI-based workflows has focused on collaboration and productivity, the perceptions of AI use within research teams remains divided. Through qualitative analysis of interviews of the five members of our mixed-ability research team, we discuss the motivations, challenges, and practices surrounding the use of generative AI in our lab. We reflect on experiences that shaped recommendations for balanced AI use that enable mixed-ability team workflows: (1) managing disability tax&crip time, (2) homogenizing identity, (3) risk disclosure of private information, (4) self-experimentation and miscellaneous tasks, and (5) information seeking. We build upon these themes to present AI practice recommendations we established for our lab to promote AI workflow adoption while preserving agency and disability identity.