Skip to content
← All posts

Can AI build a jet engine? JARVIS Challenge tests role of AI copilots in tough-tech engineering

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence · news.mit.edu · By Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics · July 14, 2026

MIT students designed, built, and tested a jet engine with AI copilots, assessing AI’s usefulness in developing high-performance aerospace systems.

Read on MIT News · Artificial Intelligence → Opens the original article in a new tab.

More from the blog

Related papers

#generative ai Open access Aug 2026

MEASURING THE IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON SOFTWARE TEAM PRODUCTIVITY AND OUTPUT QUALITY IN AGILE ENVIRONMENTS

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is becoming more incorporated into software engineering functions like code creation, debugging, requirement analysis, testing, and sharing knowledge. This research looks at how GAI affects software teams in terms of productivity and quality of the output in Agile environments. The research design used is quantitative, cross-sectional survey type using a questionnaire prepared for this research. The data used consists of 35 responses, with 34 usable cases in analyzing 30 Likert items. The measuring instrument consists of six concepts: use of GAI, efficiency of the software team, quality of the software output, GAI in Agile, team collaboration, and communication, and overall impact perceived. The descriptive results show positive feelings about the six concepts. The values on the mean for the different concepts varied from 3.54 to 3.78 on a scale of five, with GAI being the concept that received the highest mean (M = 3.78, SD = 0.47) while productivity was the one that received the lowest (M = 3.54, SD = 0.69). The instrument has a high level of internal consistency with α = 0.799 for the entire scale of 30 items. In terms of specific items, productivity, quality, and team collaboration had acceptable reliability, whereas GAI had low internal consistency and Agile and general have the upper limit of reliability therefore, construct-level findings should be interpreted cautiously. Pearson correlation analysis showed statistically significant positive associations between overall perceived impact and software output quality (r = 0.365, p = 0.034) and team collaboration and communication (r = 0.371, p = 0.031). Productivity was positively associated with overall impact but did not reach the conventional 0.05 significance level (r = 0.312, p = 0.073). In a multiple regression model, the five dimensions explained 23.5% of the variance in overall perceived impact (R² = 0.235); however, the overall model was not statistically significant (F(5, 28) = 1.719, p = 0.163). These findings support a cautious interpretation: respondents generally perceive GAI positively, but the present small sample does not provide strong evidence for broad causal claims.

ABDALMENAM KHALIF MASAUD ABUSWAH, ABDARRAHMAN KHALIF ALI ABOUSOWA, ZIAD OMAR SALEM WAREG · 0 citations
#generative ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation
#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

Adaptive Repayment Optimisation for SME Lending: A Stochastic Programming Framework with Generative AI Explanation

The Adaptive Repayment Optimisation Engine is introduced, a novel framework that applies constrained stochastic optimisation to the design of loan repayment schedules for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and contributes to the operations research literature by bridging stochastic programming, explainable AI, and financial regulation in a novel application domain.

John Christiansen · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence for Real-Time Cyber Threat Classification and Emerging Threat Detection: A Structured Review of Methods, Datasets, Challenges, and Research Directions

The reviewed literature indicates that AI-based methodologies often demonstrate superior detection capabilities for intricate and previously unseen attack patterns compared to traditional methods; however, direct performance comparisons are complicated due to discrepancies in datasets, experimental designs, and evaluation protocols.

Jaswanth Garugu · 0 citations