Feb 2024· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2402.01386· 41 citations· 81 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.
Abstract
Context: Manual qualitative data analysis is time-intensive and can compromise validity and replicability, affecting analysis design, implementation, and reporting. Large Language Models (LLMs) enable human-bot collaboration in Software Engineering (SE), but their potential for qualitative data analysis in SE remains largely unexplored. Objective: The objective of this study is to design and develop an LLM-based multi-agent system that synergizes human decision support with AI to automate various qualitative data analysis approaches. Methods: We used LLM-based multi-agents systems to assist the qualitative data analysis process, deploying 27 agents, each responsible for a specific task, such as text summarization, initial code generation, and extracting themes and patterns. Results: The main findings are: (1) the LLM-based multi-agent system accelerates the qualitative data analysis process, (2) the system effectively automates tasks such as text summarization, initial code generation, and theme extraction, and (3) the publicly accessible code facilitates validation and further evaluation. Conclusion: The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners. Future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback. The source code of proposed system and system details can be found here: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/Qualitative-Analysis-with-an-LLM-Based-Agentts
It is suggested that driver satisfaction with partial automation can coexist with uncertainty about system limits and automation boundaries, and that driver satisfaction with partial automation can coexist with uncertainty about system limits and automation boundaries.
Zhouqiao Zhao, Pnina Gershon· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
MUSE is presented, an interactive meta-agent that enhances user understanding and control of agentic data science systems by dynamically restructuring low-level execution traces into multiple semantic levels that support navigation from high-level overviews to low-level implementation details.
Wei-Hao Chen, Weixi Tong, Yuan Tian et al.· 0 citations
The analysis proposes an incremental maturity pathway, advancing from bounded advisory systems to fully integrated planning frameworks tailored to mining’s operational requirements, serving as a theoretically grounded framework to guide future empirical validation in mining.
Ricardo Nunes, Nathalie Risso, M. Momayez· IEEE Access· 0 citations
A reproducible, privacy-preserving toolkit and taxonomy that classify human turns and flag cross-cutting consistency work, agent corrections, and retracted requests, and a reproducible, privacy-preserving toolkit and taxonomy that contribute to responsibly engineering EM tooling with AI.
A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.
Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al.· 1 citation
This study identifies key knowledge challenges in scientific data analysis, derives requirements for an AI agent that supports knowledge retrieval and source code generation, and proposes design recommendations for a specialized system adaptable to the evolving AI tool landscape.
T. Fuchs, Luca Gelisio, S. Hauf et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJun 3, 2026
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.