Automatic academic paper-to-slide generation is inherently iterative, because creating an effective presentation requires repeated cycles of generation, critique, and revision. Recent multi-agent systems partially acknowledge this through internal critique-and-revise loops, while conversational approaches allow users to refine generated slide decks through dialog. However, these refinement processes either remain largely closed to the user or introduce feedback only after a complete deck has been produced, limiting the user's ability to participate in the iterative refinement of narrative flow, content allocation, and presentation emphasis. To address this gap, we introduce ConvDeck, a multi-agent pipeline for conversational paper-to-slide generation that distributes interaction across the pipeline through stage-specific loops, allowing users to iteratively refine both the presentation outline and the final slide deck at the stages where each kind of decision is made. These loops are driven by a refinement mechanism in which agents can think, speak, and act, enabling them to either directly apply edits or respond conversationally to clarify user feedback and discuss revision options. Our evaluation shows that stage-specific conversational feedback improves user-goal satisfaction while preserving narrative coherence, content quality, and visual presentation.
Tarik Can Ozden, Sachidanand VS, Furkan Horoz et al.· 0 citations
Conversational artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in everyday social environments, where it functions as both an informational tool and a source of interpersonal feedback. This perspective introduces contingency, i.e., the degree to which system responses vary with user behavior and its interpersonal consequences, as a central construct for evaluating AI systems. We argue that current alignment approaches, including reinforcement learning from human feedback, tend to prioritize user approval and conversational fluency over behaviorally informative feedback, leading to sycophantic patterns of noncontingent affirmation.
Drawing on behavioral science and social learning theory, we propose that contingent feedback is a key mechanism through which individuals develop interpersonal skills. When AI systems provide feedback weakly coupled to social consequences, they may reduce opportunities for adaptive calibration in real-world interactions, particularly during adolescence, a critical period for social development.
We outline a framework for contingent AI, including trajectory-based evaluation and models of social consequence prediction, and propose a research agenda spanning developmental psychology, human-AI interaction, and machine learning. More broadly, we argue that AI systems should be evaluated not only by user satisfaction, but by their impact on human social learning.
Document-to-slide generation is challenging because slides are dense editable artifacts that require both faithful content selection and precise spatial layout. Recent slide agents adopt iterative reflection, but typically follow a monolithic "one version, one feedback" loop: a slide or deck is rewritten, rendered afterward, and critiqued only at the turn boundary. This delayed feedback makes local failures such as overflow, overlap, clipping, and off-canvas placement difficult to attribute and repair. We propose ReDeck, a step-level render-grounded refinement framework that decomposes slide revision into atomic edit actions and returns renderer-derived observations after each step, turning refinement into "one edit, one observation." To balance local repair with global quality, ReDeck uses multi-granular feedback: step-level render feedback for spatial errors, a turn-level adaptive critic for semantic and design guidance, and a submission-level gate for hard layout validation. We further introduce DeckQuiz, a benchmark that decouples content fidelity, spatial correctness, and design quality. Across GPT-5.4, Claude-4.6, and Gemini-3.1, ReDeck consistently outperforms existing slide-generation agents, and ablations confirm that feedback timing and granularity are critical for reliable slide refinement.
Muzhao Tian, Zezi Zeng, Yifan Yang et al.· 0 citations
Public trust in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) may depend not only on technical success but also on the fairness of their decision making. While a recent trend in AV research involves using general purpose "common sense" models to guide AV decision making, the degree to which these inherit human biases in driving is still understudied. Given that psychology studies have shown human driver biases exist, such as lower pedestrian-yielding rates to Black pedestrians in the US, we argue that analyses of model bias should also be part of AV evaluation. Concretely, in this paper we propose two new bias testing methodologies for Large Language Models (LLMs) and Visual-Language Models (VLMs)-"All Else Being Equal" tests and "Self-Consistency" tests-in order to assess bias in pedestrian-yielding decisions. Our findings show that both LLMs and VLMs make yielding decisions which are influenced by pedestrian gender, ethnicity, religion, disability, age, skin tone and socio-economic status. While the type and degree of bias is different from model to model, we highlight common patterns-and raise questions about the "common sense" model paradigm, particularly the need to either revise the paradigm or address issues of downstream bias.
Irem Yoldas, Martim Brand\~ao, Jie Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
Large language models sometimes deceive users without being instructed to. However, much of the study on deception in models involves instructed deception. We investigated the relationship between instructed and spontaneous (uninstructed) deception in Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct. We compared these two deception settings through direction geometry, cross-setting classifiers, and cross-setting steering. We found the two deception settings share a component of direction (cosine of approximately 0.5) and an asymmetry in the transfer between settings regarding detection and causation. Spontaneous trained classifiers performed better on instructed data than vice versa, and instructed derived directions performed better at steering spontaneous prompts than vice versa. Likewise the best token position to derive steering vectors from differed from the best token position to train and apply classifiers.
World models have made remarkable progress in action-conditioned future prediction for embodied agents, yet still struggle to model physically plausible interactions. Existing approaches address this limitation by constraining the generation process with external representations encoding motion, geometry, or semantics. Obtaining these spatiotemporally dense representations typically requires auxiliary estimators or manual annotations, limiting training scalability. We instead revisit the training objective and identify a supervision-allocation mismatch under the globally averaged mean squared error (MSE) denoising objective: prevalent static content dominates the optimization signal, leaving sparse dynamic-object regions critical to interaction generation disproportionately under-supervised. Motivated by this observation, we introduce IMPACT, a scalable Interaction-aware Model training framework with Prior-guided Attention Calibration and Targeting. IMPACT uses cross-attention associated with manipulated-object tokens as an internal spatiotemporal prior for action-conditioned changes. It samples candidate regions from this prior, calibrates them with detached local prediction errors to construct an interaction map, and uses the map to reweight denoising supervision, requiring neither external representations nor inference-time modifications. Extensive experiments on robot-arm and human-hand manipulation, spanning diverse control modalities and DiT backbones, show that IMPACT consistently outperforms the corresponding MSE-trained baselines, improving interaction fidelity, physical plausibility, and visual quality.
Rongze Tang, Jianjie Fang, Zhaolu Wang et al.· 0 citations
AI is increasingly used in the R\&D process that produces future AI systems. We study the conditions under which this feedback becomes self-amplifying. Our model describes how the rate of AI capability growth depends on baseline research productivity, recursive feedback, and the increasing difficulty of research progress. We derive a recursive reproduction number, $\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{AI}}$, that determines whether improvements are amplified or damped across development cycles. This quantity compares the strength of feedback with the rate at which further progress becomes more difficult. When $\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{AI}}>1$, the effects of improvements compound across development cycles, placing the system in a self-amplifying regime. When $\mathcal{R}_{\mathrm{AI}}<1$, their effects weaken across cycles. The transition depends on the structure of the AI R\&D feedback loop and need not occur at any particular level of model capability. A system can therefore enter a self-amplifying regime before acceleration becomes visible, while rapid progress can also occur without self-amplification. Higher baseline research productivity can accelerate progress without changing whether the system is self-amplifying, but the duration of the development cycle becomes a limiting timescale for amplification. Increasing research difficulty can end a period of self-amplification. Extending the model to multiple research actors shows that improvements shared across organizations can make the overall research ecosystem self-amplifying even when no individual actor is. The framework identifies measurable properties of AI R\&D systems that can help distinguish recursive amplification from rapid progress driven by other sources, including the strength of recursive feedback, how effectively improvements propagate into successor systems, cycle duration, and the increasing difficulty of further progress.
This paper presents FAIRY, a full-stack smart-agriculture agent system developed for and deployed to an operating soybean research farm at Harbin Institute of Technology's smart-agriculture site. We develop FAIRY to execute and evaluate agentic agronomic operations on full-season spatiotemporal workflows that span ridge preparation, planting, irrigation, fertilization, pest and disease treatment, harvest, grain handling, drying, and storage. FAIRY integrates APIs and infrastructure across production-grade machinery, fixed soil and canopy sensors, multispectral and thermal drones, satellite vegetation products, a weather station, calibrated crop-process models, agronomic records, and multi-season yield histories. The system is built around the novel "everything is an event" execution paradigm, which represents spatiotemporal world evolution, remote sensing and UAV observations, sensor readings, crop-growth transitions, machinery actions, and management interventions as state-changing events in a shared farm process engine. On top of this event-driven world model, FAIRY implements a complete agentic stack: a knowledge library of atomic agronomic skills; multi-agent controller and orchestration backends; frontier- and edge-model execution; full-path trace logging; and deployment profiling on local nodes. We use FAIRY to evaluate nine state-of-the-art agent controllers across one hundred full-season soybean scenarios that preserve the operational coupling between spatial observations in a 64-ridge field, temporal decision sequences, agronomic constraints, delayed effects, and final yield. We develop an evaluation suite that combines agentic success, full-path spatiotemporal correctness, token cost, and edge-device runtime.
Ao Qu, Panagiotis Michelakis, Linyuan Han et al.· 0 citations
Psychometric questionnaires contain rich item-level information, yet it remains unclear whether different representation learning objectives recover the same latent organization. We investigated this question using 757 matched teacher-child pairs from the baseline assessment of the Cyprus ProW preschool trial. Behavioral structure was characterized from child SDQ, ASBI, and CBRS item responses using principal component analysis and clustering, yielding four behavioral phenotypes. A contrastive objective substantially improved teacher-child retrieval relative to PCA-based representations, increasing Top-1 accuracy from 0.13% to 7.27% and Top-10 accuracy from 1.98% to 56.14%. However, contrastive representations preserved behavioral phenotype structure less effectively than PCA-based representations. A multi-task objective jointly optimizing alignment and behavioral prediction partially restored behavioral organization but reduced retrieval performance. These findings indicate that teacher-child correspondence and behavioral phenotypes represent distinct forms of latent organization and demonstrate that the latent structure recovered from linked psychometric data depends on the representation learning objective.
Cong Cao, Tassos C. Kyriakides, Pambos Vrasidas· 0 citations
Clinical artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in real-world care, yet existing safety mechanisms are poorly suited to reconstructing and learning from individual AI-related errors and near-misses. Aggregate model monitoring can identify performance changes, and traditional patient safety reporting can capture adverse events, but neither is designed to explain how risk emerges across the interaction among AI systems, clinicians, workflows, and institutional controls. We propose AI Morbidity and Mortality (AI M&M), a structured, blameless framework for case-based review of clinical AI failures. The framework combines standardized case intake, evidence preservation and investigator-level reconstruction, tool-in-loop attribution, and corrective-action tracking. Each event is classified across four linked dimensions: Trigger - Mechanism - Clinical Pathway - Corrective Action, separating the condition that exposed a vulnerability from the process that produced risk, its consequence for care, and the remediation assigned. We demonstrate the framework using five illustrative outpatient medication and clinical decision-support cases; two clinician reviewers independently applied all four classification axes and reached agreement across all 20 axis-level classifications. AI M&M is intended to complement, rather than replace, model monitoring, patient safety reporting, and regulatory oversight by converting individual AI-in-workflow failures into actionable institutional learning. Prospective evaluation across institutions, AI systems, and clinical settings is needed.
Paulius Mui, Dean F. Sittig, Steven Labkoff et al.· 0 citations
Malaria remains a significant global health burden, necessitating continuous research efforts to understand its complex molecular mechanisms, epidemiology, and potential therapeutic interventions. Extracting essential biomedical information from the vast and constantly growing malaria literature is a challenging task that demands innovative approaches. Recently, pre-trained language models have revolutionized natural language processing tasks, demonstrating remarkable capabilities in various domains. This paper proposes a fine-tuned pre-trained biomedical language model for biomedical information extraction from scientific literature on malaria disease. The proposed methodology selects and preprocesses a large corpus of scientific articles on malaria, and then annotates them with entities of clinical significance. It then leverages BioBERT, a state-of-the-art pre-trained language model, to encode the textual data into context-aware representations. We fine-tune the model using domain-specific annotations and supervised learning to enhance its ability to extract relevant biomedical named entities. Extensive experiments and comparisons with different encoding and machine learning algorithms show that the proposed approach significantly outperforms them in precision, recall, and accuracy. We also publish our human-labeled dataset for entity and relation extraction to enable other health informatics researchers to train advanced models for malaria information extraction.
Prediction error is widely used to evaluate nuisance-function estimators in causal inference, but its relationship with causal estimator performance may differ across performance measures. We studied this question in a partially linear model using Monte Carlo simulations. We compared ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized additive models (GAMs), XGBoost, and Double Machine Learning with XGBoost (DML-XGBoost), evaluating nuisance-function prediction error, bias, RMSE, and 95\% confidence interval coverage. We also examined a simple joint-error measure based on the absolute cross-product of estimation errors from the exposure and outcome nuisance functions. Across the simulated settings, XGBoost had the lowest RMSE among the non-oracle methods, while DML-XGBoost generally provided better confidence interval coverage. Prediction error did not consistently track causal bias across methods and settings, and the method with the best point-estimation performance did not necessarily have the best confidence interval coverage. The joint-error measure was only weakly associated with causal bias and did not provide a useful standalone measure of causal performance. These results suggest that prediction error is useful for assessing nuisance-function estimation, but it should not be treated as a direct measure of the quality of the resulting causal estimator.
