Speech language models (SpeechLMs) have achieved substantial progress by extending large language models (LLMs) to the speech modality. However, SpeechLM evaluation remains heavily centered on English, limiting reliable assessment of multilingual speech capabilities. Straightforward benchmark transfer through ASR, translation, normalization, and TTS can corrupt language-specific instructions, answer constraints, and spoken forms; for audio understanding, transferring source-language audio also fails to preserve target-language speaker attributes, accents, and paralinguistic properties. To address these limitations, we propose two human-agent benchmark-construction frameworks: one transfers source-language SpokenQA benchmarks into target-language SpokenQA benchmarks, and the other converts target-language ASR corpora into audio understanding benchmarks using transcriptions and speaker metadata. Using these frameworks, we construct and publicly release three Korean speech benchmarks: KVoiceBench and KOpenAudioBench for Korean SpokenQA, and KMMAU for Korean audio understanding, comprising 12,345 samples in total. We evaluate eight recent SpeechLMs and find that English-Korean performance gaps vary substantially across models and task families, and that SpokenQA and audio understanding rankings diverge, revealing complementary weaknesses invisible to English-only evaluation.
Haechan Kim, Seungjun Chung, Inkyu Park et al.· 0 citations
When large language models are fine-tuned to generate persona- or tone-conditioned responses, their output diversity is severely limited--a failure we term Cross-Style Collapse. We trace this collapse to the cross-entropy objective, which under shared representations tends to suppress diverse continuations. We propose Semantic Flow Regularization (SFR), a lightweight auxiliary objective that supervises the backbone with continuous sentence-encoder embeddings of future segments via conditional flow matching. The stochastic flow source preserves multi-modality by construction; the flow-matching head is discarded at inference, adding zero deployment cost. On a large-scale industrial dialogue dataset (Qwen3-32B, 9 personas), SFR improves output diversity, style fidelity, and response quality over SFT. We further validate on the public LiveCodeBench-v5 (Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct), where SFR consistently improves pass@k, confirming generality beyond stylized dialogue. A controlled comparison on MBPP reveals Multi-Token Prediction to be a degenerate special case of SFR.
Kerui Peng, Feifei Li, Xingyu Fan et al.· 0 citations
Large language models often solve tasks from a fully specified prompt but degrade when the same requirements unfold over multiple turns, known as the lost-in-conversation (LiC) gap. We trace part of this degradation to self-contamination: intermediate assistant replies enter later context and carry early deviations forward. Motivated by this mechanism, we propose MAIGO, an on-policy self-distillation method that reduces this contamination using history-cleaned references from the model's own policy. For middle turns, MAIGO removes prior assistant replies while preserving the user-visible sharded prefix; for answer turns, it distills from paired full-view references conditioned on the completed user-side dialogue. A reliability weight downweights middle-turn samples that disagree with the clean reference. MAIGO requires no verifier rewards, state labels, or inference-time scaffolding. Under the LiC paired-view protocol with deterministic verifiers, MAIGO improves Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct SHARDED accuracy from 52.8 to 66.1 and the SHARDED/FULL ratio from 66.5% to 84.1%, while keeping FULL accuracy within 2.3 points. These results show that self-contamination is a trainable component of the LiC gap.
Haoyu Zheng, Yun Zhu, Shu Yuan et al.· 0 citations
Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Model (LLM) agents. However, most environments are scored only by game outcomes such as win rates and largely remain to text-only interaction, making it difficult to tell whether an agent's language is actually grounded in what it perceived and did, or to identify the failure modes underlying its behavior. To address this gap, we introduce QUACK, an open-source environment and evaluation framework for auditing the grounding of agent language in multimodal social reasoning. QUACK evaluates agents at three levels: game outcomes, behavioral trajectories, and utterance-level consistency. Its core Statement Verification Pipeline reconstructs each agent's ground-truth trajectory from engine logs and checks every discussion claim against it, automatically flagging spatial hallucination, unsupported accusation, deception collapse, and language-action inconsistency. Evaluating three frontier VLMs in both homogeneous and cross-model adversarial settings, we find that even the strongest agent hallucinates 15.1% of its verifiable spatial claims and 11.5% of accusations are strictly unsupported. We release the full engine, evaluation framework, toolkit, and logs in https://github.com/AAAAA-Academia-Attractions/QUACK.
Ye Yuan, Rui Song, Weien Li et al.· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
Evidence absence is not evidence insufficiency, but fact verification benchmarks can make them observationally similar. The Not Enough Information (NEI) label is often operationalized through constructed evidence conditions, and that choice silently determines what a verifier learns. We introduce NEI-CAP, a construction-aware diagnostic protocol for insufficient-evidence evaluation. Each NEI example carries the construction family that produced it; NEI-CAP audits shortcut cues, validates hard cases through human adjudication, and tests whether competence transfers across constructions. We instantiate the protocol on SciFact, with FEVER and HoVer as bounded external controls. Across these settings, NEI competence does not transfer reliably: encoder verifiers and an instruction-tuned decoder trained on shortcut-prone constructions fail to recognize semantically related insufficient evidence, and mixed-construction training narrows but does not close the gap. Fixed-claim diagnostics further show that the evidence condition shifts confidence in the reference Support/Refute label, not only NEI recall, so an aggregate NEI score can hide which problem a model has actually solved. We therefore recommend reporting the construction family alongside the score, and distill the results into a checklist for benchmarks that carry an insufficient-evidence label.
We test the standard RLVR tool-use recipe -- GRPO on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct -- on a deliberately minimal knowledge-graph tool API: four Freebase navigation verbs over Complex WebQuestions. Under a self-verifiable retrieval reward, the policy's tool-grounded answer rate climbs from $3.8\%$ to $9.6\%$ over 250 steps, then collapses to $0\%$ within a single 50-step window -- a \emph{peak-then-collapse} pattern replicated across four seeds. Across seven reward designs, we find four recurring failure modes: adding denser or more targeted proxy rewards shifts the failure mode rather than eliminating it. We argue that a key difference from Python interpreters, web search, and JSON APIs is interface feedback: their failures often leak natural-language signal the model saw in pretraining. A Python traceback names the failing line; an empty Freebase result \texttt{[]} does not. Stripping away that surface exposes a degradation regime that same-family reward redesigns do not fix. A direct oracle ablation rules out relation selection: injecting gold relations at every retrieval call lifts exact-match accuracy by only $+0.20$~pp, and $95.4\%$ of retrieval-dependent errors are retrieval-composition failures rather than answer-extraction failures. As a mitigation, one-iteration self-distillation reaches $40.0\%$ EM at 7B and is capacity-invariant: doubling capacity to 14B improves EM by only $0.25$~pp, and initialization barely matters -- the ceiling appears interface-bound within the 7B--14B range tested.
While factual correctness and task-performance have been in focus of Large Language Model (LLM) research for a long time, the fundamental question of how human-like generated texts are on a linguistic level has been underexplored. From a corpus-linguistic perspective, language production is inherently context-dependent, with distinct communicative contexts giving rise to differences in frequencies and co-occurrence patterns of linguistic features. A text failing to adhere to these patterns can be content-wise correct, but still be unfavorable to human readers. In this work, we propose a context-aware evaluation framework in which human-likeness is assessed using a two-sample problem between the linguistic feature distribution of a human reference corpus for a given register and a corresponding LLM-generated corpus. We implement this framework using the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and the 67 lexico-grammatical features introduced by Biber, which are commonly applied in corpus linguistics. In our experiments, we compare seven instruction-tuned, open-source models across five English-language datasets spanning distinct registers against a human baseline. While across all tested setups, LLMs deviate from the human baseline, which models are closest to human language depends on the register and is not dictated by model size.
Bj\"orn Nieth, Marianna Gracheva, Michaela Mahlberg et al.· 0 citations
Trackable improvement in multimodal physics reasoning rests on a training-and-evaluation system that is itself rarely verified: the corpora a model trains on, the reward it is optimized against, and the benchmarks and judges that score it. We audit this system end to end and find that standard construction practices systematically distort measurement: contamination slips past n-gram deduplication, translation degrades problems, saturated multiple-choice formats overstate capability, partial-credit training rewards are easier to exploit than to earn, and open-ended grading silently depends on the choice of judge. Left unverified, these distortions inflate reported progress and leak test knowledge into training. We answer with a released verifier system: a three-stage contamination audit that certifies the train/test boundary behind an audited multimodal training corpus and a held-out olympiad benchmark; a binary answer verifier that supplies the reinforcement-learning training reward; and an answer-judging harness that brackets every open-ended score between a deterministic strict layer and a large-language-model liberal layer. All per-record verdicts are released and cross-checked against an independent open-weight judge, whose substitution shifts absolute scores but preserves the sign of every base-to-trained lift. Training against the binary answer verifier confirms the certified corpus supports training: a reference recipe lifts an 8B open-source base by 18.3 points on the held-out benchmark across three seeds. The simple binary reward also beats a dense partial-credit variant on three of four open-ended benchmarks, tying the fourth. All verifiers, verdicts, and datasets are public.
Long-context adaptation is often viewed as window scaling, but this misses a token-level supervision mismatch: in packed training with document masking, each target token's effective context remains short. We introduce EXACT, a supervision-allocation objective that assigns extra weight to long effective-context targets by inverse frequency within the long tail. Across seven Qwen/LLaMA CPT configurations, EXACT improves all 28 trained/extrapolated NoLiMa and RULER comparisons. On Qwen2.5-0.5B, NoLiMa improves by +10.09 (trained) and +5.34 (extrapolated); RULER by +10.69 and +5.55. On LLaMA-3.2-3B, RULER improves by +17.91 and +16.11. Standard QA/reasoning are preserved (+0.24 macro change across six benchmarks). A distance-resolved probe shows gains arise when evidence is thousands of tokens away, while short cases remain unchanged. Results support a supervision-centric thesis: long-context adaptation depends on how strongly training supervises long-context predictions.
Jinchang Zhu, Jindong Li, Chengyu Zou et al.· 0 citations
Pre-trained language models advance patent classification and retrieval by encoding claims as flat token sequences, but they overlook the dependency hierarchy among claims. Incorporating this hierarchy into self-attention poses two challenges. First, claim dependencies include relation types with different levels of reliability, so treating them uniformly may allow noisy technical relations to interfere with more reliable legal citations. Second, claim dependencies are defined at the claim level, whereas Transformer attention operates over tokens, making direct structural injection nontrivial. We propose the Patent Heterogeneous Attention-Guided Graph Encoder (PHAGE), which constructs a typed claim graph that distinguishes legal citations from technical relations. PHAGE projects this claim-level topology into token-level attention through a connectivity mask and learnable relation-aware biases, and fine-tunes the encoder using a dual-granularity contrastive objective that combines inter-patent taxonomy with intra-patent topology. At inference, the graph-specific attention components are removed, allowing representations to be generated through a standard encoder forward pass without CDG construction. Experiments on patent classification, retrieval, and clustering show that PHAGE consistently outperforms domain-adapted and citation-aware baselines, demonstrating the value of claim-level structural guidance for graph-free patent representation learning.
Yongmin Yoo, Qiongkai Xu, Zhangkai Wu et al.· 0 citations
LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed for routine but consequential tasks in real-world domains, where their behavior is governed by inherently ambiguous domain policies that admit multiple valid interpretations. Despite the prevalence of such ambiguities in practice, existing agent benchmarks largely assume unambiguous, well-specified policies, leaving a critical evaluation gap. We introduce DRIP-R, a benchmark that systematically exploits real-world retail policy ambiguities to construct scenarios in which no single correct resolution exists. DRIP-R comprises a curated set of policy-ambiguous return scenarios paired with a realistic customer personas, a full-duplex conversational simulation with tool-calling capabilities and a multi-judge evaluation framework covering policy adherence, dialogue quality, behavioral alignment, and resolution quality. Our experiments show that frontier models fundamentally disagree on identical policy-ambiguous scenarios, confirming that ambiguity poses a genuine and systematic challenge to LLM decision-making.
Hsuvas Borkakoty, Sebastian Pohl, Cheng Wang et al.· 0 citations
Perspective API closes at the end of 2026, removing the de facto standard for toxicity measurement and exposing researchers' dependence on a tool they did not control. Drawing on this case, we argue that a research field must build and govern its own measurement infrastructure rather than borrow it. Surveying 241 papers that use or study Perspective, we show what depending on it cost the research community: claims reaching past what the tool could support, results that shifted when its model was silently retrained, and disparities researchers could measure but not explain. These failures were amplified throughout the LLM lifecycle, where Perspective supplied the labels, filtered the corpora, and graded the systems trained on each, rewarding errors rather than catching them. To keep the instrument open to study after shutdown, we release Perspective scores for 5.9 million text snippets from 77 datasets. We further specify ten requirements for measurement infrastructure a field owns, and argue that what blocks such infrastructure is not technical capability but the value the field places on infrastructure work.
David Hartmann, Manuel Tonneau, Angelie Kraft et al.· 0 citations
With millions of users across the world, Julia has been used to conduct cutting-edge research and to design new drugs, jet engines, heat pumps, and more.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.
New MIT research could lead to better materials for a fossil-fuel-free process for making the chemical that's essential to fertilizer and other products.
