Skip to content

Category

natural language processing

9,568 papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

A Deafening Silence: Catastrophic Forgetting Lives in the Output Embeddings of Tokens the Data Never Speaks

Continual pre-training and fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) inevitably induce catastrophic forgetting, typically mitigated by replay using often-inaccessible original data. In this data-free regime, we analyze where forgetting occurs and why. Systematic parameter freezing across five settings up to 1.4B reve...

Jonghyun Han, Younghoon Song, Jongyoul Park · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

MIRROR: From Imitation to Internalization in LLM Personalization

The demand for personalized LLMs is shifting from style imitation toward content quality. We investigate whether self-distillation can bridge this gap in existing fine-tuning paradigm. To address this limitation, we introduce MIRROR(Meta- personalization by Internalizing Reference-Revealed On-policy Reflections), a nov...

Huayi Lai, Jicheng Yang, Min Yi et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Decoupling Logic from Persona: Structural Immunity of Edge LLM Agents to Context Pollution

Small language-model agents on edge devices must hold a persona and reason correctly at once, inside one context window that fills with conversational history and persona instructions. We study what happens to the logical part of such an agent when that history is long, misleading and persona-heavy (persona-logic inter...

Masaaki Nakatsu, Ren-Xiong Wang · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

PARC-Loc: Text-to-Point-Cloud Localization with Partial Assignment and Relational Consistency

Text-to-point-cloud localization estimates a position in a city-scale 3D map from descriptions of surrounding objects. Existing coarse-to-fine methods retrieve submaps using aggregate learned compatibility and then localize within a selected submap. However, repetitive or similar urban objects can inflate the embedding...

Sheng-Kai Ma, Zhen-Yu Hou, Wei-Hua Cao · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

From Pareto to Preference: Personalized Test-Time Scaling via Amortized Agentic Policy Discovery

Test-time scaling (TTS) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models by allocating additional inference computation. Existing approaches to improving TTS efficiency largely optimize accuracy against one resource dimension at a time, advancing either the accuracy--cost or accuracy--latency Pareto frontie...

Xing-Lin Wang, Zi-Shen Liu, Tong Zheng et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2026

Coding-Agent Benchmarks Should Match Their Users'Task Flows

The evaluation of coding agents generally strives to be as realistic as possible. In our study, we collect 4,782 agent sessions of real software engineers in JetBrains IDEs, which we call Production Sessions. Since our subject is interactive agents, we study the sessions with at least three user messages (33% of the sa...

I. Slinko, Yaroslav Golubev, Sergey Titov · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Which Language Should a Skeleton Speak? Language Choices in Multilingual Reasoning

Skeleton-based reasoning prompting is a promising training-free approach for structuring LLM reasoning, but prior work largely assumes an English-centric setting. We propose the Language-Aware Skeleton Exploration Framework (LASEF) to study skeleton-language choice in multilingual mathematical reasoning. Across math be...

HyeonSeok Lim, Seung-Woo Song, Inho Won et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Collaborative Reasoning Distillation via Cross-Feedback and Coherent Curation

Reasoning capabilities are critical for advancing Large Language Models, yet current approaches either require massive computational budgets or struggle to effectively distill reasoning to smaller models. Standard distillation methods rely on outcome-based rewards, failing to distinguish between sound reasoning and luc...

Tae-hong Kim, Seunggeun Cho, Dong-Su Han · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

How Do LLMs Change Predictions Under Negation?

Negation is an essential feature of human language, yet large language models (LLMs) remain unreliable in processing it. We evaluate recent open-source and closed-source LLMs on our negation benchmark and find that, in 37-71% of cases, they repeat the same answer under negation (e.g., "Madrid" for "What is not the capi...

Jongwook Yoon, Jongwon Lim, Sungjib Lim et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Arctic Questions, Missing Answers: A Dataset and Benchmark for LLM Abstention in Arctic Science

Large language models (LLMs) should abstain from scientific multiple-choice questions when no option is valid, but frequent abstention alone does not demonstrate sensitivity to answer availability. We introduce ArcticQA, a dataset of 194 questions derived from primary Arctic research, with automated checks of answer su...

Benjamin Wilcox, Dawei Gao, Pradeeban Kathiravelu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

The Confidence Game: Strategic Miscalibration in Human-AI Delegation

Calibrated uncertainty quantification is essential to ensuring AI agents are trustworthy and reliable. However, when agents seek to maximize user engagement or revenue, confidence reports may be strategically distorted, detracting from their informativeness. We formalize this problem in the Confidence Game: a repeated...

Raghu Arghal, Saswati Sarkar, S. S. Bidokhti · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

OnlineQAT: On-Policy Distillation for Ultra-Low-Bit Large Language Models

Quantization-aware training (QAT) can recover much of the accuracy lost when large language models are compressed below four bits. Existing re- covery stages, however, are commonly optimized on fixed completions or teacher-generated answers, whereas the deployed quantized model condi- tions on prefixes generated by its...

Wen-Jun Wang, He-Ping Li, Yang-Gan Gu et al. · 0 citations

From tech blogs

See all →
Microsoft Research Blog Oct 22, 2026

Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations

Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.