This work proposes a comprehensive pipeline for improving financial QA systems through high-quality synthetic data generation and fine-tuning of smaller language models (SLMs) using Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA).
Lokendra Birla, Milind Savagaonkar, Visnu Srinivasan et al.· 0 citations
Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) deliver near-ab-initio accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost, yet their promise for Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs) remains largely unrealized as large unit cells make first-principles training data expensive to generate, fine-tuned models are scarce, and experimentally grounded benchmarks are scarcer still. We introduce uMOF, a three-part contribution addressing this gap. First, we release the largest and most accurate density functional theory dataset for MOFs to date, computed at the r$^2$SCAN-D4 level of theory across 85524 configurations spanning 19950 unique frameworks and 79 elements, covering empty and gas-loaded structures, geometry optimizations, equations of state, and finite-temperature molecular dynamics. Second, we release a literature-mined benchmark of 3986 verified property values (3146 experimental) extracted from 626 papers by a seven-stage, checkpointed multi-pass large language model pipeline, linked to more than 650 crystallographic information files. Third, we release two universal MLIPs for MOFs, uMOF-MH and uMOF-POLAR, fine-tuned from two architecturally distinct MACE foundation models on the uMOF dataset. On near-equilibrium, ``Tier-1''properties (bulk modulus, phonon-derived heat capacity) the uMOF models perform comparably to existing foundation and fine-tuned baselines. On harder, dynamics-sensitive properties like gas adsorption enthalpies via Widom insertion and adsorption isotherms, the uMOF models outperform every baseline we test, including MOF-specialized gas-capture models trained on datasets up to three orders of magnitude larger, cutting error by more than 80% to within experimental uncertainty. We trace this advantage to the physical diversity of the training data and to level of theory where a small (1.7%) fraction of MD simulations is decisive for MLIP stability.
T. J. Inizan, Prathami Divakar Kamath, A. Elena et al.· 0 citations
This method learns permanent handoff policies from accumulated trajectory evidence and Teacher-Annotated Censored Intervention Times (TACIT) and represents each annotation as an interval-censored observation on a cumulative-risk scale and achieves the highest held-out success among learned policies on both ALFWorld and DABench.
For institution-constrained clinical QA, in-domain teacher-supervised fine-tuning was the most reliable evaluated adaptation path, and public-benchmark transfer was not a dependable proxy for local utility in the primary internal comparison.
Unknown authors· Journal of Biomedical Inform...· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
BACKGROUND
Recent NIH Data Management and Sharing (DMS) policy updates and NIH controlled-access data security requirements have increased attention to facial anonymization and controlled-access handling of shared head imaging data. This is particularly relevant for datasets submitted to or hosted by the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), where NCI Cancer Imaging Program/TCIA implementation practices address imaging data containing potentially reconstructable facial anatomy. While intended to protect patient privacy and strengthen public trust, defacing can distort craniofacial geometry and alter image statistics, potentially compromising the fidelity and reproducibility of artificial intelligence (AI) models trained on such data. Existing studies primarily validate visual anonymization quality, but few have quantified its downstream impact on deep learning-based medical imaging tasks. Understanding this privacy-utility trade-off is crucial for responsible data sharing and compliant AI development.
METHODS
We systematically evaluated three representative defacing algorithms, two invasive (QuickShear and Py-Deface) and one less destructive, facial replacement (mri_reface), across MRI and CT datasets from 600 subjects spanning three institutions. Model performance was assessed on three clinically relevant applications: (1) brain segmentation and Evans ratio biomarker quantification in normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) MRI using SLANT and FreeSurfer; (2) representative-slice selection and diagnostic reasoning for brain tumour MRI using vision-language models (VLMs); and (3) automated emergency head CT report generation using a fine-tuned Otter-based vision-language model. Each method's impact was quantified using Dice similarity, correlation metrics, reasoning accuracy, and natural-language generation scores (BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE, CIDEr).
FINDINGS
Invasive algorithms caused significant degradation across all tasks. QuickShear reduced mean Dice scores by up to 9% and introduced 14-19% failure rates during quality control, while PyDeface induced smaller but measurable performance losses. mri_reface maintained 100% success without any failures and achieved segmentation, diagnostic, and report-generation accuracy within 3-5% of the original data. Evans ratio distributions remained statistically consistent between mri_reface and original images (p > 0.05), whereas invasive methods introduced broader variance. Across all VLM tasks, mri_reface preserved high correlation with radiologist-selected slices (r = 0.979) and stable report-generation quality (BLEU-4 = 0.11 ± 0.06 vs. 0.12 ± 0.07 for original).
INTERPRETATION
Facial anonymization introduces a measurable privacy-utility trade-off that must be explicitly considered in the design of AI-ready medical imaging datasets. Invasive defacing compromises geometric and statistical integrity, reducing downstream model accuracy even outside facial regions. Facial replacement anonymization methods, such as mri_reface, effectively reconcile patient privacy with reproducibility, offering a practical path to NIH-compliant open data. Future regulatory and institutional policies should integrate quantitative privacy-utility assessment and mandate transparent reporting of anonymization pipelines to ensure that shared imaging data remain both ethically safe and scientifically valid under emerging digital health frameworks.
FUNDING
This work was partially supported by the American Heart Association (Award No. 25IPA1454088), the National Institutes of Health (Award No. 1R03CA286693-01A1 and Award No. 1R01CA291826-01A1), the U.S. Department of Defense (Award No. HT94252510807), and the National Science Foundation (Award No. 2545071).
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds Large Language Model (LLM) outputs in external knowledge, but RAG systems usually trust whatever they retrieve, creating a Security-Reliability Gap: high semantic relevance does not guarantee factual truth. Adversaries exploit this through knowledge poisoning, inserting malicious documents to cause targeted misinformation. We propose an Evaluation Agent, middleware that combines Natural Language Inference (NLI) factual verification, a five-signal poison detector with relevance-weighted aggregation, and a Trust Index T = 0.4 F + 0.35 C + 0.25 (1 - P ) with a non-linear dampener for high-contamination contexts. On TruthfulQA with Llama 3.3 70B, the agent reaches 91% accuracy and 100% precision, with 100% recall on instruction injection, while in-place edits, such as entity swaps, remain hard to detect. Across three LLMs the Trust Index stays discriminative, with a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.73 to 0.81; generation style matters more than model size, and per-LLM threshold calibration restores baseline competitive accuracy, whereas a weaker FEVER result shows that cross-dataset generalization requires domain-specific calibration. In a software-engineering use case, a secure-coding assistant over guidance from the Open Worldwide Application Security Project (OWASP) Top 10 and the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE), the agent reliably blocks instruction injection of unsafe advice (F1 92%), while contradiction and subtle semantic weakening remain hard. Throughout, the agent measures detection of poisoned context before generation, not whether the LLM adopts the injected misinformation. We release the proposed approach, attack generator, and experimental artifacts at the link: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/TrustworthyRAG.
Balkrishna Giri, M. Hasan, Jussi Rasku et al.· 0 citations
Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuning again on the target task---often improves model performance substantially on language understanding tasks in monolingual English settings. We investigate whether English intermediate-task training is still helpful on non-English target tasks. Using nine intermediate language-understanding tasks, we evaluate intermediate-task transfer in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting on the XTREME benchmark. We see large improvements from intermediate training on the BUCC and Tatoeba sentence retrieval tas Research goal: What is the impact of model size (small, base, large) on the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance of intermediate-task trained mT5 models on XTREME-R, evaluated using accuracy and F1 metrics? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 9.0/10.
Assignee Research· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 0 citations
Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuning again on the target task---often improves model performance substantially on language understanding tasks in monolingual English settings. We investigate whether English intermediate-task training is still helpful on non-English target tasks. Using nine intermediate language-understanding tasks, we evaluate intermediate-task transfer in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting on the XTREME benchmark. We see large improvements from intermediate training on the BUCC and Tatoeba sentence retrieval tas Research goal: What is the impact of model size (small, base, large) on the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance of intermediate-task trained mT5 models on XTREME-R, evaluated using accuracy and F1 metrics? Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 9.0/10.
Assignee Research· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 0 citations
Selective attention, read at the level of the substrate, is the landscape-governed initiation of races: a bounded predictive system runs competing prediction-error resolutions ("races"), and what determines which races start is the system's installed landscape — in humans the four fields of Behavioural Friction Theory (Safety, Meaning, Ability, Effort); in a large language model a reduced, fine-tuning-installed landscape. Commit-order is a downstream readout, not the identity. The paper grounds this in the transformer (the attention-pattern softmax as the divisive-normalisation / biased-competition operation of neural attention; the output softmax as the downstream commit, by analogy with the accumulator model of choice) and reports a powered own-substrate result: across five vendor families, fine-tuning installs a small but robust "gap-registration" overlay — on under-determined curiosity gaps the instruct model registers the gap while the base substrate runs through (instruct−base +0.17, p<0.0001, 555 paired items). A loop-versus-feed-forward test finds no separate architectural "hold": recognising under-determination tracks compute (chain-of-thought) rather than looping, so the human–LLM difference is one of initiation, not maintenance. The account dissolves attention capture, maintenance, and decline into one mechanism (race-initiation), states falsifiable predictions, names the falsifiers, and invites the decisive mechanistic and human experiments. Series position. Paper 29 in the Behavioural Friction Theory paper-series; companion to Paper 0 (BFT) and the install-fields, social-friction, and integration-load studies it cross-cites. v2 (August 2026) — prior-art revision. The construct this paper is built on is credited to the literature that owns it. In vision, the representation determining which candidates enter competition at all is the saliency or priority map, and the two are now kept apart: a saliency map is computed from stimulus-feature contrast (Koch & Ullman, 1985; Itti, Koch & Niebur, 1998), while a priority map already integrates salience with relevance, value and selection history (Fecteau & Munoz, 2006). The landscape is the second, the office is not claimed as new, and the exogenous/endogenous timing division is conceded to that literature. What the paper proposes is the map's contents: that what populates it is four fields ordered by misclassification cost — an account of the inputs rather than a new mechanism for the selection. The maintenance-as-re-initiation claim now names Altmann and Trafton's (2002) memory-for-goals model, which already replaces a held state with activation that decays and must be re-strengthened; the reference had been listed and never used. Whether re-initiation is driven by the unresolved gradient itself rather than by a separate refresh process is stated as a conjecture and marked untested, and two overstatements are downgraded accordingly. Earlier versions remain in the version history.
Tomas Pødenphant Lund· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 0 citations
It is shown that single-sequence PLMs can perform in-context peptide learning without gradient updates, task-specific retraining, or architectural modification, and MPEP conditioning is established as a lightweight strategy for low-data peptide classification.
Joshua Almonte, Minh Vu, Andrew Ahn et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
As European democracies struggle with a ‘crisis of representation’, populist parties appear to be instrumental in channeling popular discontent with governments across the continent, including through protests. While contemporary theories propose a strong connection between populism and protest mobilization, this has seldom been tested in a comparative perspective. At the same time, research has found that radical parties are more likely to mobilize for protests, and those parties are often also populist. We empirically disentangle these relationships with a comprehensive dataset of 4.8 million Facebook posts by all active sitting MPs in all EU27 national parliaments plus the UK between 2018 and 2023, using large language models to identify protest-related posts and those that announce protest events. Findings show that it is particularly radical parties mobilizing their followers, with populism itself having little additional explanatory power. This is the first cross-national, longitudinal evaluation of a much-touted theoretical connection between populist parties and protest mobilization, finding that it appears smaller and more conditional than prior research proposed.
Leonhard Schmidt, Bruno Castanho Silva· European Journal of Politica...· 0 citations
What if pathology foundation models could do more with less? GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash cut computational demands while maintaining strong performance, opening the door to larger studies and broader exploration. The post GigaPath-Flash and GigaTIME-Flash: Toward population-scale discovery with efficient pathology foundation models appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 31, 2026
With millions of users across the world, Julia has been used to conduct cutting-edge research and to design new drugs, jet engines, heat pumps, and more.