Jul 2026· International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces· pp. 1-6· 0 citations· 35 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
An exploratory lab study measuring users’ Emotional Background (EB) during three local device-maintenance tasks in a prompt-based assistant and a menu-based baseline interface found patterns appeared to cluster around three interaction moments.
Abstract
As AI assistants shift from answering questions to executing actions, small interaction choices can influence users’ moment-to-moment experience. We report an exploratory lab study (N=20) measuring users’ Emotional Background (EB) during three local device-maintenance tasks in a prompt-based assistant and a menu-based baseline interface. We derived an EEG-based EB index and triangulated it with eye tracking and post-task questionnaires. EB trajectories were task-dependent: the prompt-based assistant produced higher EB for straightforward app deletion, while the baseline yielded higher EB for malware checking and troubleshooting. EB decreases appeared to cluster around three interaction moments: formulating an initial request, encountering negatively framed system-health terminology, and processing rapid or ambiguous automation of consequential actions. Survey responses indicated greater willingness to delegate non-personal tasks than personal communications. We discuss these patterns as preliminary evidence and outline design considerations for pacing, framing, transparency, and prompt scaffolding.
This Work-in-Progress examines whether personality-informed prompting changes perceived LLM emotional support in driving scenarios designed to elicit stress. A condition-order-balanced, within-subject CARLA simulator study (n = 14) compared a baseline with a Driver Personality Profile (DPP) condition; a supplementary o...
Max Mittelstädt, Ece Sutanrikulu, Lumbardh Ljatifi et al.· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
It is suggested that AI’s non-human nature can both reduce stigma and increase concerns about trust and authenticity, and human-centered systems should provide age-appropriate safety guardrails, transparent limitations, privacy protections, and clear pathways to human support.
Jing-Jie Wang, Theresa Nguyen, John Marion et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
HACoD is proposed, a Human–Agent Emotional Co-Driving Framework that links driver emotional needs, human–agent collaboration patterns, and affective agent design elements and highlights the need for transparent data boundaries and real-world validation.
Wei Gong, Ming-Yuan Zhang, Mei-Cheng Liu et al.· Proceedings of the 18th Inte...· 0 citations
A shared vocabulary, a design space, and evidence that measured monitoring and task performance are separable design targets are contributed, suggesting that measured monitoring and task performance are separable design targets.
M. A. D. Santos, P. Thiesse, Steeven Villa et al.· 0 citations
LLM-based conversational agents generate fluent responses but remain limited in adapting their supportive style to individual personality and emotional needs. We present a Detect–Regulate–Evaluate (D–R–E) architecture that performs turn-by-turn Big Five detection and applies Zurich Model-inspired behavioural regulation...
Duojie Jiahua, Samuel Devdas, Mirjam Stieger et al.· Electronics· 0 citations
MindBeat, a multimodal system prototype based on fidgeting, is designed to support a lightweight, user-negotiable form of embodied self-regulation, and discusses how rhythmic scaffolding can transform fragmented, often suppressed fidgets into a callable regulatory medium.
Wen-Jie Xu, Zian Xu, Rui Zhang et al.· Proceedings of the 28th Inte...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.