Jul 2026· British Journal of Arts and Humanities· 4 citations· 25 references
TL;DR
The analysis finds that there seems to be an important change in the "honor code" approach of the traditional system for a more complex system that has been recognized as "contract cheating 2.0" and biases of algorithmic detection.
Abstract
This research report examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on academic integrity in higher education on a global scale while specifically analyzing professional education in the USA. In this era marked by the widespread presence of Large Language Models like ChatGPT, DeepSeek and Gemini, the traditional ways of assessment are challenged as never before. This study refers to the literature published in the last five years (2021-2026) to assess the pedagogical, ethical, and technical aspects of the use of AI. The analysis finds that there seems to be an important change in the "honor code" approach of the traditional system for a more complex system that has been recognized as "contract cheating 2.0" and biases of algorithmic detection. Main findings include the opportunities that GenAI brings to personalized learning and student productivity as well as the need to radically reimagine assessment frameworks. The report presents a comparison of the existing different detection methods and draws attention to the potential incompleteness of detection, including the dangers of false positives and bias against non-native speakers. Last, it provides recommendation for both the USA Law Schools and regulators for a future of "AI Literacy" and pedagogical integrity rather than punishment-based surveillance.
Current practices related to AI use are examined, focusing on LLM-based ghostwriting and the reliability of disclosed interactions as evidence of authentic use, and the possibility of mimicking authentic interactions, which raises concerns about the effectiveness of current approaches.
This document outlines the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological underpinning of the AI-Augmented Pedagogy Integration Model (AAPIM), which has now been further supported by a growing evidence base of 2025–2026 meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
Ahnaf Afsin, Rumaysha Tahan Towaa, Kasif Suhail Ayate et al.· Frontiers in Computer Scienc...· 0 citations
It is argued that detection-centred enforcement is a structurally weak control and proposed instead a layered institutional framework in which policy and governance, pedagogy and assessment redesign, and technology-based assurance operate as mutually reinforcing controls, sustained by a continuous audit and improvement...
Dr. G. Purushothaman, Dr. S. Ganapathy, Mr. Saurabh Jaiswal, Mr. Thanga Kumaran M· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be focused solely on preventing fraud, and this needs to expand to support ethical digital literacy, redesign learning tasks that require human reasoning, and ensure fairness in automated decision-making systems.
W. Phornprasert, W. Nuankaew, Pratya Nuankaew· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The dual role of GenAI in higher education is explored, particularly in addressing issues of multiculturalism and racial discrimination in the European university classroom and a series of challenges and considerations that universities must take into account when welcoming GenAI into their spaces are proposed.
AI acts primarily as an amplifying tool rather than an independent driver of academicbehavior, reflecting pre-existing attitudes toward learning and ethics, suggesting pre-existing attitudes toward learning and ethics are reflected.
Aleksandar Vučković, Ernest Vlačić, A. Davidovic· Notitia· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.