Skip to content
Review Open access

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and the European Higher Education Area (EHEA): reimagining equity in the university classroom

Jul 2026 · Interdisciplinary Journal of Didactics · pp. 55-67 · 0 citations · 7 references

TL;DR

The dual role of GenAI in higher education is explored, particularly in addressing issues of multiculturalism and racial discrimination in the European university classroom and a series of challenges and considerations that universities must take into account when welcoming GenAI into their spaces are proposed.

Abstract

By late 2022, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots had gained significant traction and began raising questions about their impact on education. While technological advancements might appear objective and free from human bias due to their calculated precision, they often inherit the partialities embedded in their training data, which tend to reflect the inequities already present in society (Vicente and Matute, 2023). In the process towards a more diverse and inclusive technological society, the role and accountability of universities is essential. Biases related to racism, LGBTQ+phobia, xenophobia, sexism, or ableism can inadvertently seep into the educational process, negatively affecting students’ learning experiences. It is crucial for educators to recognize the potential dangers these technologies pose in the pursuit of a more equitable society and discrimination-free educational environments. Notwithstanding, AI-based tools also hold immense potential in enhancing the transmission of knowledge. This article explores the dual role of GenAI in higher education, particularly in addressing issues of multiculturalism and racial discrimination in the European university classroom. It studies GenAI’s potential to hinder and/or contribute to equity and casts light upon GenAI’s ability to help lecturers and students overcome prejudice. This article employs a qualitative integrative review methodology, synthesizing current scholarship on algorithmic bias with a critical policy analysis of the European Parliament’s 2024 AI Act and recent Eurydice reports (2022, 2023). This dual-layered approach allows for the identification of systemic gaps between macro-legal frameworks and micro-pedagogical needs in multicultural European Higher Education Area (EHEA) classrooms. Finally, the article proposes a series of challenges and considerations that universities must take into account when welcoming GenAI into their spaces.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education

The analysis finds that there seems to be an important change in the "honor code" approach of the traditional system for a more complex system that has been recognized as "contract cheating 2.0" and biases of algorithmic detection.

Sathy Akter · 4 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Peningkatan Literasi Etika Artificial Intelligence (AI) bagi Guru SMP Negeri 18 Gresik

The program produced tangible outcomes in the form of improved teacher competencies in responsible AI utilization, AI-assisted instructional resources, and strengthened awareness of digital ethics, thereby supporting sustainable digital transformation in secondary education.

R. Bisma, Ghea Sekar Palupi, Anggraeni Widya Purwita et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Educating minds with generative AI

This Perspective argues that this framing of GenAI obscures a deeper transformation in education, and proposes treating it as a diagnostic opportunity to redesign schooling for embodied, collaborative, and distinctly human forms of learning.

L. D. Di Paolo, Andy Clark, Thomas Wachter · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence and English-Medium Education

The rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI) tools into higher education (HE) presents both transformative opportunities and pressing challenges, particularly in English-medium education (EME) classrooms. While GenAI tools offer innovative possibilities for enhancing instruction, assessment, and learner autonomy, the...

Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, Jack Pun, Samantha Curle · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Education: Transforming Learning Outcomes, Academic Integrity, and Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education

This document outlines the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological underpinning of the AI-Augmented Pedagogy Integration Model (AAPIM), which has now been further supported by a growing evidence base of 2025–2026 meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

Ahnaf Afsin, Rumaysha Tahan Towaa, Kasif Suhail Ayate et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Understanding AI Use in Education: Language Learning and Academic Integrity In 2026

This current short paper investigates how to utilise the power of AI for language acquisition while the schools protect the moral rules and honest thinking which are highly required in the Malaysian and global educational landscape.

Z. Sumery, H. Sarijari, Siti Zarikh Sofiah Abu Bakar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.