Applications, multidimensional challenges, and innovative pedagogical practices of generative AI in mathematics education: a systematic review 2022–2026
Aug 2026· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations· 39 references
TL;DR
An integrated analytical framework combining the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework with hybrid intelligence theory is proposed, and a novel pedagogical paradigm in which AI errors serve as instructional resources for cultivating critical thinking is identified.
Abstract
This study investigates the application of generative artificial intelligence (generative AI) in mathematics education from 2022 to 2026. Drawing on a systematic literature review of 268 articles retrieved from OpenAlex, and EBSCO databases, we identify and analyze 66 core research articles through a rigorous screening process following PRISMA guidelines. The findings reveal three key patterns. First, generative AI applications in mathematics education span four domains: student learning support (64%), teacher instruction assistance (38%), assessment and feedback innovation (27%), and special education (2%), with student learning support as the dominant application area. Second, while generative AI shows positive effects in enhancing learning motivation and providing personalized support, it exhibits notable limitations in mathematical reasoning accuracy and critical thinking development—with 70% of studies documenting AI limitations. Third, challenges associated with these applications are multifaceted, encompassing technical (30%), pedagogical (52%), ethical (20%), and implementation (42%) dimensions. We propose an integrated analytical framework combining the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework with hybrid intelligence theory, and identify a novel pedagogical paradigm in which AI errors serve as instructional resources for cultivating critical thinking. Future research directions include broadening application domains, deepening theoretical frameworks, and strengthening empirical investigation. This review is limited to English-language publications from two databases, with the search closing in June 2026. Despite these limitations, the review contributes systematic evidence and practical guidance for the effective integration of generative AI in mathematics education.
Overall, AI shows potential to support mathematics teaching and learning, but stronger longitudinal and comparative evidence is needed to establish effectiveness, equity, and sustainable implementation.
Fariza N. Omirzakova, S. Tileubay· European Journal of STEM Edu...· 1 citation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about significant changes in the educational landscape, driven primarily by the advancement of generative models and the increasing availability of tools capable of supporting teaching and learning processes. This study aimed to analyze the main possibilities and challenges asso...
A. F. da Silva, Rosimeire Rozendo, Cristiane Aparecida Simão Silverio· Brazilian Journal of Science· 0 citations
Empirical evidence is contributed from educational action research showing that structured pedagogical interventions can promote the critical, ethical, and responsible use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in education.
Rodrigo Florêncio da Silva· Information· 1 citation
Despite the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education, research on its use in biology education remains fragmented, making it difficult to assemble a comprehensive picture of current trends and applications. This study systematically examines research trends, methodological characteristics...
Çiğdem Çıngıl Barış· Revista Andina de Educación· 0 citations
A systematic literature review aims to synthesize existing evidence on the evolving roles of mathematics teachers within AI-enhanced educational contexts and to develop a comprehensive framework explaining role transformation, and contributes a holistic conceptualization of teacher role transformation.
Vaijayanti Aphale, Ketki Kher, Vijayanta Bhurale et al.· Journal of Asia Entrepreneur...· 0 citations
It is proposed that mathematical literacy in the AI era should extend beyond traditional competencies to include the ability to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs, identify algorithmic limitations, and use AI responsibly a construct this review tentatively terms Mathematical AI Literacy.
Andi Mangaraja, D. Hasibuan, Ramadhan Herianto et al.· Mathline : Jurnal Matematika...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.