Skip to content

Artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A PRISMA-based systematic literature review (2021-2025)

Sep 2026 · European Journal of STEM Education · Vol 11, pp. 43 · 1 citation · 61 references

TL;DR

Overall, AI shows potential to support mathematics teaching and learning, but stronger longitudinal and comparative evidence is needed to establish effectiveness, equity, and sustainable implementation.

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines research on artificial intelligence (AI) in mathematics education published between January 1, 2021, and August 1, 2025. Searches of Scopus and Google Scholar identified 922 records; after deduplication, screening, and full-text eligibility assessment, 42 peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings were included. The review used descriptive quantitative summaries and a deductive-inductive thematic synthesis. Two independent reviewers conducted screening (Cohen's kappa = 0.88), and methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The included literature indicates increasing attention to generative AI, personalised support, feedback, teacher practice, academic integrity, and equity. Evidence for educational benefits varies substantially across study designs and contexts, and technical capability should not be equated with demonstrated classroom effectiveness. Geographic patterns in the selected sample are described without attributing them to regulatory, economic, or infrastructural causes that were not directly tested. Because the 2025 search covered only January through August 2025, publication counts are treated as partial-year data and are not directly comparable to complete prior years. Key limitations include reliance on two databases, English- and Russian-language restrictions, reproducibility constraints in Google Scholar, methodological heterogeneity, and limited long-term evidence. Overall, AI shows potential to support mathematics teaching and learning, but stronger longitudinal and comparative evidence is needed to establish effectiveness, equity, and sustainable implementation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Roles of Mathematics Teachers: A Systematic Literature Review

A systematic literature review aims to synthesize existing evidence on the evolving roles of mathematics teachers within AI-enhanced educational contexts and to develop a comprehensive framework explaining role transformation, and contributes a holistic conceptualization of teacher role transformation.

Vaijayanti Aphale, Ketki Kher, Vijayanta Bhurale et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Biology Education: A Systematic Review of Research Trends, Applications, and Future Directions (2020–2026)

Despite the accelerating integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education, research on its use in biology education remains fragmented, making it difficult to assemble a comprehensive picture of current trends and applications. This study systematically examines research trends, methodological characteristics...

Çiğdem Çıngıl Barış · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

ENHANCING ASSESSMENT LITERACY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AI TOOLS IN EDUCATION

Abstract* Background Assessment is a core component of the learning process, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping how educational assessments are designed, implemented, and evaluated. This systematic review synthesized evidence on the use of AI in educational assessment and examined its implications for streng...

J. Pongkendek, Diana Rochintaniawati, Nahadi Nahadi et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Aug 2026

Mapping of Artificial Intelligence Applications and their Impacts on Academic Performance in Higher Education (2020–2025): A Systematic and Bibliometric Literature Review

This study maps and synthesises Scopus-indexed research published between 2020 and 2025 and contributes an outcome-centred synthesis that connects bibliometric patterns with the methodological and pedagogical strengths of the available evidence.

Mohammed Adi Al-Battashi, M. A. M. Adnan, Hassan Abuhassna et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Applications, multidimensional challenges, and innovative pedagogical practices of generative AI in mathematics education: a systematic review 2022–2026

An integrated analytical framework combining the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework with hybrid intelligence theory is proposed, and a novel pedagogical paradigm in which AI errors serve as instructional resources for cultivating critical thinking is identified.

Zeng-Fu Chao, Tianhong Han · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.