Sep 2026· Journal of Consumer Marketing· pp. 1-19· 84 references
AI in Service Interactions
Abstract
Purpose Loneliness, as a mental health epidemic alongside the artificial intelligence (AI) improvements, has received attention in the literature. Motivated by the need to belong, lonely consumers experience psychological states that influence their trust in AI, resulting in inconsistent findings in this emerging research stream. The purpose of this study is to provide a synthesized and structured overview of the state-of-the-art research focused on social (dis)connection, trust and AI. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review of 31 empirical studies was conducted following the PRISMA protocol. The review synthesizes findings from diverse research designs to identify theoretical themes related to socially (dis)connected consumer trust in AI. Findings Seven thematic domains emerged from the analysis – spanning social connection and belonging, self-differentiation, humanization, privacy considerations, social interpretation and human–computer and computer-mediated interaction. These domains inform a framework explaining how social (dis)connection shapes consumer trust in AI and outlining key theoretical, methodological and practical avenues. The review further introduces the compensatory-defensive trust in AI framework that clarifies when social disconnection heightens versus diminishes trust in AI. Originality/value This study presents a novel synthesis of literature on socially (dis)connected consumer trust in AI, proposing a new conceptual framework to guide future research. It emphasizes the importance of developing a comprehensive theory of lonely human trust in AI, exploring the nomological networks of related constructs and adopting methodological diversity. These contributions help advance academic understanding and inform ethical AI design sensitive to socially disconnected consumers.
The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 64 citations· ⚡6
The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al.· arXiv.org· 62 citations· ⚡3
The use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams is explored, with a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System developed and implemented at the company.
Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al.· International Conference on...· 48 citations· ⚡4
This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.
Abdul Malik Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al.· arXiv.org· 44 citations· ⚡2
The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners, and future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback.
Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al.· arXiv.org· 41 citations
MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 30, 2026
Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.
Critical flaws, compromised release channels and agentic AI threats landed within days of each other in mid-October 2026. Why “Black October” may say more about how well we now find weaknesses than about the attacks themselves. The post Black October? The Week AI Changed the Cybersecurity Conversation appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.