Skip to content

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

Mar 2024 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2403.08399 · 44 citations · ⚡ 2 influential · 29 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision.

Abstract

Systematic literature review (SLR) is foundational to evidence-based research, enabling scholars to identify, classify, and synthesize existing studies to address specific research questions. Conducting an SLR is, however, largely a manual process. In recent years, researchers have made significant progress in automating portions of the SLR pipeline to reduce the effort and time required for high-quality reviews; nevertheless, there remains a lack of AI-agent-based systems that automate the entire SLR workflow. To this end, we introduce a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs. Leveraging large language models (LLMs), our system streamlines the review process to enhance efficiency and accuracy. Through a user-friendly interface, researchers specify a topic; the system then generates a search string to retrieve relevant academic papers. Next, an inclusion/exclusion filtering step is applied to titles relevant to the research area. The system subsequently summarizes paper abstracts and retains only those directly related to the field of study. In the final phase, it conducts a thorough analysis of the selected papers with respect to predefined research questions. This paper presents the system, describes its operational framework, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision. The code for this project is available at: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/SLR-automation .

View source

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Systematic Literature Reviews With Two Multi-Agentic Systems And Human-In-The-Loop

Two fit-to-purpose multi-agentic systems for systematic literature review, with human-in-the-loop support, are proposed, specifically designed to support Human-In-The-Loop which is essential for clinical decisions.

Zexin Ren, Zi-Xuan Zhao, Qi-Yun Li et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Metag: A dataset to build agentic meta-reviewing capabilities

Metag is a dataset to accelerate the development of meta-reviewing agents, specifically to identify changes made to scientific articles during the review-rebuttal process and will enable building methods to empower meta reviewers to quickly identify whether authors have addressed reviewer statements and where in the pa...

Anirudh S. Sundar, Min Chen, Divya Tadimeti et al. · 0 citations

SurveyAgent-HKA: A multi-agent framework for scientific survey generation with LLMs and human knowledge augmentation

SurveyAgent-HKA is introduced, a multi-agent framework that improves end-to-end scientific survey generation by incorporating knowledge derived from published surveys and peer-review comments and which outperforms mainstream baselines in citation quality, structural consistency, and content quality.

Tong Bao, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Yi Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

The Problem Is the Problem: Towards Scalable Mathematical Discovery

Inspired by search and recommender systems, this work builds Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR), a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering.

Zeyu Zheng, Shengtong Zhang, Jeremy Avigad et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence Resources for the Screening of Titles and Abstracts in Systematic Reviews: A Scoping Review

This review aims to identify current evidence concerning AI use during preliminary SLR reference screening and describes characteristics such as the different metrics used for reporting performance and how the different algorithms, pipelines, workflows or web applications are validated.

A. M. Barragán, Sara Elena Ortiz Bonett, Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Jun 3, 2026

MIT researchers teach AI models to interpret charts

The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.