Artificial Intelligence in Practice-Based and Creative Learning Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Designs and Learning Outcomes
Sep 2026· Journal of Educational and Social Research· 0 citations· 41 references
TL;DR
The evidence supports a cautious conclusion: AI commonly expands ideation, visualization, feedback, and workflow options, while stronger claims about improved creativity or learning depend on controlled designs, objective/artefact-based assessment, and longer-term evidence.
Abstract
This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence (AI), including generative and non-generative systems, is integrated into practice-based and creative learning in higher education, and how strongly the reported outcomes are supported by the underlying evidence. Searches of Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC identified 166 records. After duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, retrieval, and full-text assessment, 38 studies were retained for synthesis after one conference paper that conflicted with the stated eligibility criteria was removed. The included literature was concentrated in architecture/interior design, art/visual arts, and graphic/visual design. Studio-based pedagogy was the most frequent primary format (14/38, 36.8%), followed by project-based learning (11/38, 28.9%). AI most often supported ideation and visualization (23/38, 60.5%), although 15 studies embedded AI across multiple stages of the learning or design cycle. Twenty-eight studies (73.7%) were coded as positive in direction, four (10.5%) as mixed-to-positive, and six (15.8%) as mixed. These directions should not be interpreted as equivalent causal effects: eight studies relied primarily on objective tests/performance, eight on artefact/expert evaluation, eight on self-report, and the remainder on mixed or process evidence. Methodological appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) identified eight studies with relatively higher confidence, 23 with moderate confidence, and seven with lower confidence within this review corpus. The evidence therefore supports a cautious conclusion: AI commonly expands ideation, visualization, feedback, and workflow options, while stronger claims about improved creativity or learning depend on controlled designs, objective/artefact-based assessment, and longer-term evidence.
Received: 22 April 2026 / Accepted: 13 August 2026 / Published: September 2026
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about significant changes in the educational landscape, driven primarily by the advancement of generative models and the increasing availability of tools capable of supporting teaching and learning processes. This study aimed to analyze the main possibilities and challenges asso...
A. F. da Silva, Rosimeire Rozendo, Cristiane Aparecida Simão Silverio· Brazilian Journal of Science· 0 citations
This study systematically reviews the current evidence on AI in academic writing using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines and contributes a comprehensive synthesis of current research by integrating pedagogical, assessment, and human perspectives through the...
Saidatul Akmar Zainal Abidin, Noor Hanim Rahmat· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Objectives. As artificial intelligence increasingly enters educational practice, PE pedagogy faces a distinct question that extends beyond online, blended, or technology-enhanced delivery. This study mapped research on artificial intelligence in PE pedagogy from 2015 to 2025, focusing on publication growth, conceptual...
J. Lobo· Physical Education Theory an...· 0 citations
This narrative review argues that the most consequential effect of GenAI is not the automation of existing teaching practices but the need to redesign curricula, learning outcomes, pedagogies, and assessment around disciplinary judgment, critical verification, intellectual independence, and transparent, ethical use of...
C. Papaneophytou, Stella A. Nicolaou· Trends in Higher Education· 0 citations
This paper presents a systematic scoping review on the adoption, reported outcomes, and implementation challenges of advanced technologies in engineering education (EE). Unlike earlier reviews that focus on a single tool, it examines multiple technology domains within a unified framework to explore how immersive system...
Rozali Badaoui, K. Kövesi, Nicolas Jullien et al.· Discover Sustainability· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) now shapes how learning experiences are designed, but the research linking digital and instructional learning design with AI, learning analytics, and personalized or adaptive learning is scattered across separate fields. This paper reports a systematic literature review (SLR) carried out un...
Muhamad Nanang Suprayogi, Suwarno· International Conferences on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.