By integrating protein structures with mutation data from 139,818 patients, this study generates detailed, functional maps of mutations for 173 cancer genes in 18+ tumor types, providing a proteo-genomic framework to characterize the effects of mutations in tumorigenesis and integrate them into workflows for clinical interpretation in precision medicine.
Abstract
Cancer genomes harbor hundreds of mutated genes, but their exact roles in tumorigenesis often remain incompletely understood. Here, by integrating protein structures with mutation data from 139,818 patients, we generate detailed, functional maps of mutations for 173 cancer genes in 18+ tumor types. In most cancer genes, oncogenic mutations accumulate in "significantly mutated regions" aligned with key functions, including DNA-binding domains in transcription factors (e.g., FOXA1), ligand-binding sites in receptors (e.g., ERBB2), catalytic domains in chromatin remodelers (e.g., EP300), substrate-recognition sites in ubiquitin-proteasome regulators (e.g., SPOP), and degradation signals in cell-cycle proteins (e.g., CCND1). In other cancer genes, mutations align more closely with constraints in three-dimensional protein structures, such as targeting the interior core (e.g., TP53) or a specific secondary structure (e.g., PTEN). Broadly, our study provides a proteo-genomic framework to characterize the effects of mutations in tumorigenesis and integrate them into workflows for clinical interpretation in precision medicine.
TP53 and FOXA1 mutations, observed in primary and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, were associated with aggressive disease phenotypes and potential therapeutic resistance, and these findings highlight TP53 and FOXA1 as promising biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in prostate cancer.
High-coverage whole-genome sequencing, large-scale transcriptomics, and eQTL are used to map male cancer cell lines, revealing a region-specific LOY landscape with recurrent euchromatic deletions affecting protein-coding genes and non-coding elements and motivating validation in primary tumor cohorts.
Trini Nguyen, Aditi Kuchi, Hong-Yu Liu et al.· Communications Biology· 0 citations
The role of adaptive mRNA structures in regulating gene expression in mammalian cells remains poorly understood. Synonymous mutations have been linked to a range of diseases, including cancer, yet their impact on cell biology remains largely unexplored. This opinion focuses on how cancer-associated synonymous mutations...
This review integrates the molecular logic of splice-site selection with the cancer-specific mechanisms that perturb it, summarizes representative isoform switches across the hallmarks of cancer, evaluates emerging technologies and clinical biomarkers, and discusses the opportunities and constraints of translating spli...
Cancer genomics has concentrated on individual mutations, overlooking whether somatic mutations can accumulate to produce partial, gene-level disruption with biological and clinical consequences. Sequence-to-function models can quantify these effects directly from DNA sequence. Here, we use AlphaGenome and AlphaMissens...
A. Nayak, Travita Lee, V. Agarwal et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.