Beyond Average Error through Oracle-Informed Stress Tests for Time-Series Forecasting

Abstract

Average squared error cannot reveal whether forecasting performance degrades because the future becomes less predictable or because forecasts move farther from the conditional mean. We introduce paired, mechanism-controlled stress tests that decompose changes in expected squared error at each lead time into environmental risk and forecast-oracle distance, using an origin-conditioned predictive oracle unavailable to the evaluated models. Three end-to-end controls have known attribution. Specifically, the null, environmental-only, and information-gap controls verify that the pipeline assigns changes to the correct component. We then apply the benchmark to 24 deployable forecasters. Under frequent switching, 14 methods have higher realized MSE but lower oracle distance; under outlier-variance feedback, 19 have higher MSE but lower scale-standardized MSE. Short- and long-lead stress-response rankings have Spearman correlation 0.624, revealing substantial horizon-dependent reordering. We then study multivariate relation shifts. Across six models and three coupling severities, oracle distance accounts for only 0.7-3.9% of the decomposed expected-risk increase, and environmental-risk majority persists in an eight-channel system and a matched-difficulty audit of Ring, Block, and Hub relations. Finally, prespecified contrasts on independent data-generating process (DGP) realizations show that several visually compelling discovery profiles, including trend accumulation and the hypothesized switching reversal, do not replicate. The benchmark thus combines component-wise diagnosis with a held-out stability audit. It complements real-data out-of-distribution evaluation, which measures performance under realistic shifts when exact oracle attribution is unavailable.