Skip to content
Open access

KEBIJAKAN AFIRMATIF 2% BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DALAM REKRUTMEN ASN: TELAAH KESETARAAN SUBSTANTIF PERSPEKTIF MAQĀṢID AL-SYARĪ‘AH

Sep 2026 · El-Dusturie · 0 citations · 16 references

Abstract

Abstract: The 2% affirmative action quota for persons with disabilities in the recruitment of Civil Servants (ASN) is a legal instrument designed to address inequality and promote fairer employment opportunities. However, the normative existence of the quota does not necessarily guarantee substantive equality, as barriers remain in access to information and available positions, the selection process, reasonable accommodation, and the creation of an inclusive working environment. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of the 2% affirmative action policy in ASN recruitment and assess its effectiveness in realizing substantive equality from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. This study employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis examines the relationship between affirmative action, the merit system, substantive equality, and al-Syatibi’s concept of al-ḍarūriyyāt al-khamsah. The findings show that the 2% quota has a strong legal basis and is not contrary to the merit system. Affirmative action is instead necessary to ensure that persons with disabilities have a genuine opportunity to demonstrate their qualifications and competencies. Nevertheless, its implementation has not fully achieved substantive equality because the fulfillment of the quota is not always accompanied by appropriate job positions, accessibility, reasonable accommodation, assessment based on actual abilities, and an inclusive working environment. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, the policy is consistent with the pursuit of public benefit through the protection of life, intellect, lineage, and property, as well as the principles of jalb al-maṣāliḥ and dar’ al-mafāsid. Therefore, the 2% quota should not be understood as an exception to the merit system, but as a mechanism for ensuring a fairer and more substantive application of merit for persons with disabilities. Keywords: Affirmative Action; Persons with Disabilities; Civil Servant Recruitment; Substantive Equality; Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah.   Abstrak:Kebijakan afirmatif kuota 2% bagi penyandang disabilitas dalam rekrutmen Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) merupakan instrumen hukum untuk mengoreksi ketidaksetaraan dan mewujudkan kesempatan kerja yang lebih adil. Namun, keberadaan kuota secara normatif belum sepenuhnya menjamin terwujudnya kesetaraan substantif karena masih ditemukan hambatan dalam akses informasi dan formasi, proses seleksi, penyediaan akomodasi yang layak, serta lingkungan kerja yang inklusif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konstruksi hukum kebijakan afirmatif 2% dalam rekrutmen ASN dan menilai efektivitasnya dalam mewujudkan kesetaraan substantif perspektif maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Analisis dilakukan dengan menghubungkan kebijakan afirmatif, sistem merit, kesetaraan substantif, dan konsep al-ḍarūriyyāt al-khamsah dalam pemikiran al-Syatibi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kuota 2% memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat dan tidak bertentangan dengan sistem merit. Afirmasi justru diperlukan untuk memastikan penyandang disabilitas memperoleh kesempatan yang nyata dalam menunjukkan kompetensinya. Namun, implementasinya belum sepenuhnya mencapai kesetaraan substantif karena pemenuhan kuota belum selalu diikuti kesesuaian formasi, aksesibilitas, akomodasi yang layak, penilaian berdasarkan kemampuan aktual, dan lingkungan kerja yang inklusif. Dalam perspektif maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, kebijakan tersebut sejalan dengan orientasi kemaslahatan melalui perlindungan jiwa, akal, keturunan, dan harta serta prinsip jalb al-maṣāliḥ dan dar’ al-mafāsid. Dengan demikian, kuota 2% perlu dipahami bukan sebagai pengecualian terhadap sistem merit, melainkan sebagai mekanisme untuk mewujudkan penerapan merit yang lebih adil dan substantif bagi penyandang disabilitas.   Kata kunci: Kebijakan Afirmatif; Penyandang Disabilitas; Rekrutmen ASN; Kesetaraan Substantif; Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Kelalaian Adminitrasi Negara Dalam Penjaminan Hak Atas Kesehatan: Studi Kasus Penonaktifan Bpjs Pbi Terhadap Pasien Cuci Darah (Kasus Ajat, Rangkasbitung 2026)

The right to health is a constitutional right that must be guaranteed by the state through the provision of sustainable health services, including for participants of the Social Security Administering Body (BPJS) Recipient of Contribution Assistance (PBI). However, the deactivation of BPJS PBI membership due to the upd...

R. Malik · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual oleh Pemerintah Kota Semarang dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia

Data from the Semarang City Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection (DP3A) indicate that cases of violence against women and children remain relatively high. There were 227 cases in 2023, increasing to 266 in 2024 and 334 in 2025. As of July 10, 2026, 102 cases had been recorded. These figures demonstrate th...

Yoga Adi Pawoko, Adityo Putro P · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

REKONSTRUKSI FUNGSI KURATIF BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK) KOTA PALANGKA RAYA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA NON LITIGASI

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the curative function of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) of Palangka Raya as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution outside the court, as well as to identify and critically examine the normative weakness and executorial constraints faced by BPSK in en...

Yolita Elgeriza Agustin, FX Ary Setiawan, Sefina Januarica Anggrainy · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual Berdasarkan Pasal 25 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual

As part of its commitment to safeguarding children who fall victim to sexual violence, Indonesia enacted Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning TPKS. Article 25 of this law raises the evidentiary weight given to a victim's testimony, yet its application in practice has not run smoothly, as illustrated by Court Decision Numbe...

Ayu Salsabila, A. Asnawi, Ayang Fristia Maulana · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Tinjauan Yuridis SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2023 terkait Pisah Enam Bulan dalam Perkara Perceraian Ditinjau dari Prinsip Keadilan

The high divorce rate in Indonesia prompted the Supreme Court to issue SEMA No. 3 of 2023, which establishes a six-month separation period as a requirement for divorce, in accordance with the principle of making divorce more difficult. This provision has sparked various controversies because it is considered not to ful...

Martin Heo, N. Mediawati · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Pasal dalam Dakwaan terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan dalam Jabatan berdasarkan Pasal 374 KUHP (Studi Putusan 947/Pid.B/2025/PN.Srg)

Embezzlement in office occurs when a person abuses the trust vested in them by virtue of their position. In Decision No. 947/Pid.B/2025/PN.Srg, the defendant, H. Sunohdi, S.E., was charged under Article 372 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) for acts committed while serving as Chairman of the BMT Muamaroh Cooperative, a posit...

A. Salsabila, Iron Fajrul Aslami, Safiulloh Safiulloh · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.