Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to image-based and image-formatted geoscientific evidence across mineral exploration, from regional and surface surveys to drilling/core analysis and laboratory characterization. However, the literature remains distributed across different research communities, making it difficult to compare how visual evidence, AI tasks, methodological choices, and geological outputs relate across exploration contexts. This systematic mapping review searched the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore for English-language journal articles published between 2016 and 2026. Of 397 identified records, 91 studies were retained after deduplication, screening, and full-text assessment. The studies were mapped across exploration contexts, visual-data domains, AI visual tasks, methodological paradigms, and geological outputs. Regional and surface survey data dominate the evidence base, while drilling/core and laboratory imaging remain less represented. Classification is the most frequent visual task, and CNN-based models remain the dominant methodological paradigm, with hybrid and emerging architectures forming the next major group. The evidence does not indicate a single architecture that is uniformly suitable across mineral-exploration settings; model choice depends on input structure, required geological output, labeled-data availability, and spatial scale. Multisource integration can combine complementary evidence, but differences in spatial support, annotation, sensing conditions, and validation design continue to limit direct comparison and cross-region generalization. Future progress requires more traceable public resources, geographically independent validation, and more systematic integration of complementary geological evidence.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...
Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al.· arXiv.org· 121 citations· ⚡9
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.