A five-agent workflow to systematically identify divergent protein-membrane-interface sites across class A GPCRs and exploit them for selective allosteric ligand discovery is developed, establishing a scalable strategy for translating GPCR membrane-interface divergence into precise allosteric sites and testable subtype-selective ligand candidates.
Abstract
Closely related G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes often share highly conserved orthosteric pockets, making subtype-selective ligand development challenging. Here, we developed a five-agent workflow to systematically identify divergent protein-membrane-interface sites across class A GPCRs and exploit them for selective allosteric ligand discovery. By combining dMaSIF-derived surface fingerprints with Ballesteros-Weinstein (BW) position alignment, we compared structurally equivalent membrane-facing regions and identified the three most divergent hotspots for each of 163 receptor pairs. These regions showed substantial spatial overlap with experimentally characterized allosteric sites. Paired target-off-target screening of one million lead-like compounds, followed by detail-mode redocking and multi-seed consistency filtering, yielded 352 receptor-pair-specific candidates corresponding to 344 unique compounds across 104 receptor pairs. These candidates, together with their divergent sites and predicted selectivity profiles, were integrated into a searchable database. Our findings establish a scalable strategy for translating GPCR membrane-interface divergence into precise allosteric sites and testable subtype-selective ligand candidates.
GaMD ensemble docking improved early AM enrichment across all four targets under at least one program, and the Boltz-2 deep-learning program showed minimal sensitivity to GaMD templates and underperformed conventional docking, suggesting its affinity predictions complement rather than replace physics- and empirical-bas...
T. D. Thompson, Ying-Long Miao· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This study provides potential lead compounds for the design of small-molecule allosteric drugs targeting class B1 GPCRs and performs conformational sampling and combined dynamic pocket detection algorithms, MDpocket and FTMove, to identify six characteristic cryptic pockets within the dynamic trajectories.
Zhi Dong, Long Cheng, Qingxin Shi et al.· International Journal of Bio...· 0 citations
G protein‐coupled receptors are integral membrane proteins that mediate physiological processes by enabling cells to detect and respond to diverse stimuli by enabling cells to detect and respond to diverse stimuli.
Berkay Selçuk, Gunnar Schulte, Igor B. Zhulin et al.· British Journal of Pharmacol...· 0 citations
Understanding how allosteric modulators influence protein dynamics is essential for guiding drug design. This work analyses a total of 45 μs of classical molecular dynamics simulations for four class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), namely the Complement C5a receptor (C5AR1), the Purinergic Receptor P2Y (P2RY1),...
S. Peter, G. Chalhoub, Peter J. McCormick et al.· Journal of Chemical Informat...· 0 citations
This Primer outlines experimental and computational workflows tailored to peptide–GPCR interactions, including in silico peptide mining, deorphanization strategies, library-based screening platforms, modern pathway-resolved biosensor assays, and approaches for peptide stabilization and optimization strategies to addres...
J. Hermes, Marin Matic, H. Yeung et al.· Nature Reviews Methods Prime...· 0 citations
It is revealed that while models achieve strong performance on structurally novel ligands, generalization to novel GPCRs remains challenging, with particularly poor prediction for out-of-family receptors.
Souvik Dey, P. Lu, Anders Wallqvist et al.· Journal of Cheminformatics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.