This work proposes SafePO, a reinforcement learning algorithm for refining violation identification while balancing explanatory reasoning and final verdicts, and develops AdaGuard, a family of 0.6B, 4B, and 8B guard models that assess agent trajectories under policies supplied at inference time.
Abstract
Guard models support the safe deployment of language model agents, but fixed risk taxonomies limit their ability to accommodate requirements that vary across applications and tasks. Under user-defined policies, detecting violations requires interpreting both the applicable rules and the agent's behavior, since identical actions can receive different judgments under different policies. To support learning this capability, we introduce AdaptiveSafety, a dataset of 10,939 training examples and 1,000 test examples covering policies with 1--100 rules. The dataset combines trajectories from multiple sources with policy and behavioral counterfactuals, pairing each example with an explanation and the complete set of violated rules. These counterfactuals expose changes that alter compliance, while structural augmentations provide supervision for consistency under rule reordering and identifier remapping. Building on this supervision, we propose SafePO, a reinforcement learning algorithm for refining violation identification while balancing explanatory reasoning and final verdicts. SafePO uses structured rewards to assess prediction correctness, retains group-relative advantages at the response level, and employs a separately trained value model to modulate token weights within explanation and verdict regions. Separate normalization controls their relative contribution to training despite differences in length. Through supervised initialization followed by SafePO, we develop AdaGuard, a family of 0.6B, 4B, and 8B guard models that assess agent trajectories under policies supplied at inference time. Our 4B model achieves binary accuracies of 89.30\% on AdaptiveSafety and 71.82\% on DynaBench. The project repository is available at https://github.com/Yunhao-Feng/AdaGuard
Enterprise generative AI applications require robust safety mechanisms that can accommodate diverse risk postures, evolving policies, and varying latency constraints. Current guardrail solutions often suffer from rigidity, relying on fixed policy sets and offering limited transparency or reasoning flexibility. We prese...
This work contributes an evidence-bounded audit and composition protocol, not a claim of universal interpretability or autonomous skill generation, and defines auditability as six separately testable predicates: trace integrity, lossless coding, rule coverage, behavioral agreement, composition quality, and value-model...
HazardAuditor is introduced, an execution-grounded framework that runs heterogeneous agents in controlled environments and normalizes their interactions into a canonical event representation for cross-framework supervision, and observes that token-level post-training objectives create a structural mismatch for generati...
Yun-Hao Feng, Rui-Xiao Lin, Ming Wen et al.· 0 citations
SkillShift is presented, a constrained black-box framework for covert policy steering without explicit target command injection or task hijacking that combines semantically plausible policy edits with hierarchical validation, failure-guided optimization, and strategy compression to preserve effectiveness, output validi...
Jia-Rui Li, Jia-Hao Chen, Chun-Yi Zhou et al.· 0 citations
This paper proposes a split-control architecture in which an untrusted planner emits typed security intents, a deterministic governor checks each intent against safety, resource, temporal-stability, and proportionality invariants, and only admitted actions are bound to signed receipts and compiled into pre-installed eB...
Ijaz Ahmad, Flavio Esposito, Erkki Harjula· 0 citations
EvoSafeHarness is a safety-specific optimization framework that synthesizes a deployable harness for a frozen model in a target domain, guided by model behavior, domain specifications, and fresh-context adversarial review to reject benchmark-specific rules.
Nanxi Li, Ying-Zi Ma, Yulong Cao et al.· 2 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.