Skip to content

When Does Depth Matter For In-Context Learning? Adaptive Inference in Deep Transformers

Jun 2026 · 0 citations · 61 references
Computer Science Physics Biology

TL;DR

The results suggest that depth and feedforward blocks enable transformers to implement adaptive inference, and this is advantageous when the distribution over latent variables has hierarchical structure.

Abstract

Transformers perform computations through many successive attention and feedforward blocks, allowing them to learn complex correlations between a large collection of coupled variables. When does stacking successive attention-feedforward computations over many layers provide a computational advantage over a single transformer block? We address this question by examining in-context learning in generalized linear attention transformers. We first introduce a general theory of distributed inference in such transformers, subject to constraints on communication and depth. We show that such systems can exploit internal representations (`function vectors') to infer a latent context variable at increasingly finer scales over its layers. For an in-context linear regression task, the theory predicts that while one-layer transformers without feedforward blocks are optimal for Gaussian priors over the context variable, multi-layer transformers are superior for non-Gaussian, tree-like priors. Trained linear attention transformers reproduce quantitative predictions from the theory. Using causal key-patching experiments, we verify that function vectors in intermediate layers mediate adaptive routing of information. Our results suggest that depth and feedforward blocks enable transformers to implement adaptive inference, and this is advantageous when the distribution over latent variables has hierarchical structure.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.