Skip to content

Evaluating a School Waste Bank Strategy for Strengthening Students’ Environmental Responsibility: A Case Study at SDN 4 Tanggungharjo

Aug 2026 · Didaktika Jurnal Kependidikan

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the strategy for strengthening students’ environmental care character through the Waste Bank program at SDN 4 Tanggungharjo, Grobogan Regency. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation involving the principal, teachers, students, Waste Bank management team, and other relevant school stakeholders. Data analysis was conducted through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing, while data credibility was established through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that the evaluation of the Waste Bank strategy was conducted through four interconnected mechanisms: periodic evaluation and collective reflection, financial transparency and program accountability, adaptive responses to problems, and program sustainability. Periodic evaluation enabled the school to identify problems related to student participation, waste sorting, and program management and to formulate corrective actions collaboratively. Financial transparency was maintained through individual student savings records and the main Waste Bank financial records, strengthening accountability and trust. Adaptive responses transformed students’ mistakes in waste sorting into learning opportunities through additional explanation, guidance, and repeated practice. Program sustainability was supported by institutional planning and budgeting, adequate facilities, continued student participation, and cooperation with external waste-management partners. Overall, the evaluation process demonstrated that the Waste Bank had developed beyond a waste-collection activity into a school-based mechanism for strengthening environmental care character. The evaluation functioned as a feedback mechanism connecting reflection, corrective action, behavioral reinforcement, accountability, and institutional sustainability. The study concludes that the effectiveness of a school-based Waste Bank strategy depends not only on the implementation of environmental activities but also on the school’s capacity to continuously evaluate, adapt, and institutionalize the program to support students’ environmental responsibility.

View source

Similar papers

AI-Enabled Performance-Based Procurement and Life-Cycle Maintenance of Highway Bridges: Integrating Single-Bid Risk Analytics and PPP Payment Optimization

Model-based life-cycle evaluation indicates that AI-optimized PPP contracts reduce bridges reaching emergency condition by 30%–40% over a 30-year horizon while lowering life-cycle costs by 8%–12% compared with rule-based policies, providing infrastructure agencies and private concessionaires with an integrated AI-driven life-cycle management platform.

Ali Shehadeh, Odey Alshboul · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Open access Aug 2026

DIArc Foundational Note v0.1 — Minimum Claim Edition

Abstract The rapid development of artificial intelligence has significantly increased the availability of information, analytical capability, and machine-assisted reasoning. However, greater access to information does not necessarily produce better decisions. In many organizational contexts, the emerging bottleneck is no longer information acquisition, but the human and organizational capacity to determine what information is sufficient, when analysis should stop, when a decision should be made, and how outcomes should improve future judgment. This Foundational Note introduces Decision Intelligence Architecture (DIArc) as an architectural framework for Human–AI collaborative decision systems. DIArc is based on a central proposition: in the AI era, competitive advantage increasingly depends not on maximizing information, but on maximizing the rate at which high-quality decisions generate learning and improve judgment, under explicit constraints on information consumption and decision cycles. The architecture is organized into four theoretical layers. First, the Capability Inversion Hypothesis describes a structural shift in which information, knowledge, and analysis become increasingly abundant while judgment, commitment, execution, and learning become comparatively scarce capabilities. Second, Identity-driven Information Consumption (IDIC) describes a decision failure mechanism in which continued information consumption may serve identity reinforcement rather than decision improvement. Third, the Decision Constraint Architecture, comprising Decision Information Budget (DIB) and Decision Cycle Budget (DCB), introduces explicit constraints on information consumption and analytical iteration. Fourth, High-quality Decision Velocity (HQDV) describes the performance objective of accelerating completed high-quality decision loops, while Judgment Evolution Rate (JER) represents the longer-term evolutionary objective of improving judgment through outcome-based learning. This note constitutes the initial public disclosure of the DIArc architecture and establishes its theoretical baseline for subsequent research and branch concepts.

Lucas Xiaochun Xu · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.