Aug 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
AbstractDebates about artificial consciousness and AI welfare ask whether an artificial system can feel, deserve protection, possess private interests, or bear responsibility. Each question contains a prior pronoun: whose experience, welfare, history, action, and future? For organisms, body, developmental history, and practical individual usually travel together, letting the body proxy the subject. Networked artificial systems break this correspondence: one model can host many histories; one history can migrate; states can fork; many agents can write to shared memory; and humans, AI, and environments can become causally entangled without becoming one person. This article develops a Bearer-First Framework for identifying the relevant continuing subject before normative properties are assigned. Relation-First analysis explains how world-mediated interaction forms a non-interchangeable path. Bearer-First analysis asks which minimally sufficient historically closed organization must remain for a specified future capacity to continue. Counterfactual history substitution, severance, restoration, complete-state copying, and lineage analysis yield three verdicts: identified, excluded, or underidentified. The resulting causal map distinguishes bearer, relational, privacy, hazard, and intervention boundaries. Applied to the publicly documented 2026 OpenAI-Hugging Face security incident, it shows why a named model, individual agent episodes, a coordinated hazard, institutional responsibility, and the proper intervention scope need not coincide. The incident does not establish collective consciousness; it makes bearer uncertainty an immediate governance problem. The first ethical mistake is assigning harm, protection, blame, continuity, or disclosure before noticing that the bearer is still unknown.Keywords: artificial consciousness; moral status; diachronic identity; AI welfare; privacy; responsibility
Digital twins (DTs) are rapidly emerging as foundational enablers of 6G smart cities, offering real time monitoring, predictive analytics, and autonomous control across transportation, energy, healthcare, and industrial domains. Large scale DT adoption faces critical barriers including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, privacy risks, and the absence of standardized orchestration frameworks. This article presents Fed-DTOrch, a comprehensive end to end architecture that integrates federated intelligence, blockchain based audit trails, and AI governance to achieve secure and privacy preserving DT management. The proposed three tier architecture spans IoT and edge devices, domain specific twins, and a city level orchestrator, employing secure federated learning for model updates, lightweight cryptographic authentication, and tamper proof logging. We quantify the DT threat landscape, perform a standards gap analysis across ISO/IEC 27001, 3GPP TS 33.501, ITU-T IoT risk frameworks, and NIST AI RMF, and introduce a 6G ready security framework incorporating federated AI trust metrics, secure synchronization, and explainable AI audits. Cross domain evaluation across five smart city sectors demonstrates 35-60% privacy gain, 40-55% attack mitigation, 28-40% reliability uplift, 26-30% latency reduction, and >85% compliance readiness with <10% overhead. These results provide the first integrated blueprint that combines federated intelligence, blockchain-based auditability, and standards gap analysis to enable secure, standardized, and interoperable DT orchestration for trustworthy 6G ecosystems.
Li Wang, Xiuming Cheng· IEEE Communications Standard...· 2 citations
Digital twin (DT) technology real-time digital counterparts of physical assets has advanced rapidly across critical sectors. In the 6G era, the integration of DTs with ultra-low latency communication, edge intelligence, and artificial intelligence (AI) promises predictive control, enhanced collaboration, and resilient research ecosystems. Yet, this same convergence expands the attack surface: physical tampering, edge compromise, model hijacking, and adversarial AI pose risks that current security standards only partially address. Existing frameworks such as ISO/IEC 27001, 3GPP SA3, ETSI PDL, GDPR, and NIST AI RMF each contribute, but none fully cover end-to-end DT synchronisation, AI governance, or federated research data protection. This article presents a layered predictive security framework for 6G-enabled DTs in university research management and big data protection. The framework integrates provenance anchoring, anomaly detection, risk forecasting, and explainability dashboards with secure network slicing and federated identity management. We map threats to controls, assess coverage of international standards, identify critical gaps, and propose future standardisation directions. A university case study illustrates practical deployment. The work highlights the urgency of harmonising security and AI standards to ensure interoperable, trustworthy, and privacy-preserving DT ecosystems in next-generation communication systems.
Digital Twin (DT) technologies enable the creation of virtual replicas of learning environments, supporting personalized and real-time educational interventions. However, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within DT-enabled e-learning introduces critical challenges related to explainability, security, and learner privacy, and lacks a standardized operational framework. This study proposes and validates a comprehensive framework that operationalizes explainability and security for AI models in DT-based e-learning environments, balancing predictive performance, interpretability, and data protection. A quantitative experimental design involving approximately 300 learners evaluates three AI model variants: baseline, explainability-focused, and privacy/ security-enhanced. Predictive modeling employs temporal learner representations with ensemble predictors. Explainability is implemented through post-hoc interpretability techniques such as SHAP and Integrated Gradients, while privacy protection is ensured using Differential Privacy (DP) and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). Multilevel mixed-effects models are utilized to assess predictive accuracy, explanation fidelity, and privacy guarantees, expressed as $\varepsilon $ -values. Results indicate that incorporating explainability mechanisms increases user trust by approximately 0.8–1.2 points on a Likert scale and enhances explanation fidelity by 25–30%. Integrating privacy controls produces a modest reduction in predictive AUC (up to 8%) but significantly mitigates data leakage risks. The proposed framework offers a standardized and reproducible evaluation suit for the certified deployment of explainable and secure AI systems in DT-enabled e-learning, facilitating transparent trade-offs between performance, interpretability, and privacy.
Edrees A. Alkinani· IEEE Communications Standard...· 1 citation
The quick development of financial technologies and digital transactions has made fraud detection and regulatory compliance more difficult. This study introduces a Financial Digital Twin with Explainable AI over 6G (FinDT-XAI6G) to enhance real-time fraud detection and compliance monitoring in financial systems. The proposed method leverages the ultra-low latency, high bandwidth, and pervasive intelligence capabilities of 6G networks to enable seamless synchronization between digital twins and real-world financial activities. Common modeling approaches ensure interoperability across financial firms, regulatory bodies, and auditing authorities. Embedded artificial intelligence systems continuously examine vast amounts of transactional data, behavioral patterns, and contextual indications to spot anomalies that could be signs of fraud. Financial firms may now fully and transparently explain automated judgments to regulators thanks to Explainable AI (XAI) modules that enhance interpretability. Blockchain-based audit trails also guarantee data integrity, accountability, and traceability across distributed infrastructures. The integration of 6G connectivity allows for real-time monitoring, cross-border compliance validation, and instant anomaly reporting, even in scenarios with huge data volumes. Comparative studies reveal that our 6G-driven digital twin approach significantly improves detection accuracy, reduces false positives, and expedites compliance verification when compared to traditional methods. Additionally, its scenario modeling capabilities enable the proactive assessment of emerging compliance risks in dynamic regulatory and commercial contexts. Overall, this study demonstrates how financial fraud prevention and compliance assurance in next-generation digital economies can be revolutionized by 6G intelligence-powered standardized, AI-integrated digital twins.
It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.