It is argued that the teacher’s role in AI-based instruction is being reconfigured rather than diminished, offering implications for teacher professional development and the design of teacher-facing AI systems.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has made AI-based instruction, including intelligent tutoring systems, learning analytics dashboards, adaptive learning platforms, and generative AI, increasingly prevalent in K-12 education. However, AI-generated information does not automatically lead to pedagogical action; it gains instructional meaning only when teachers interpret, judge, and translate it into situated classroom support. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review analyzed 29 peer-reviewed English-language studies published between 2016 and 2025 across six databases to examine how teacher intervention is constituted in K-12 AI-based instruction and what conditions shape its reported effects. The synthesis was organized around three dimensions: process, strategy, and effect. Findings indicate that teacher intervention operates as a cyclical process of monitoring, judgment, intervention, and orchestration, through which AI-generated information is transformed into pedagogical action and subsequent classroom adjustment. Three broad intervention strategies were identified: pedagogical translation of AI outputs, design of learning support, and reconstruction of interaction structures. Reported benefits for student learning and teacher orchestration were generally promising but conditional, varying according to the interpretability of AI information, intervention timing, target level, teachers’ implementation feasibility, and students’ autonomy. By presenting an integrated conditional framework, this review argues that the teacher’s role in AI-based instruction is being reconfigured rather than diminished, offering implications for teacher professional development and the design of teacher-facing AI systems.
This review examines how AI is integrated into EFL/ESL education across language skills, instructional domains, and educational contexts and conceptualises AI in EFL/ESL education as a pedagogical ecology in which tools, learners, teachers, feedback regimes, assessment practices, institutional infrastructures, and gove...
Arash Javadinejad, M. Davari· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
One of the first comprehensive syntheses of AI integration across the entire CAR cycle is offered, linking it explicitly to critical-thinking development within a reflective, teacher-led inquiry framework, an intersection that remains underexplored in the extant literature.
Yusriani Yusriani, Andi Yuyung· ETDC: Indonesian Journal of...· 0 citations
It is implied that AI-supported calculus instruction should be treated as a coordinated instructional system rather than a technology add-on if it is to contribute meaningfully to the U.S. STEM pipeline.
Emmanuel Nsadha, E. Tetteh· Asian Research Journal of Ma...· 0 citations
It is suggested that AI can enhance drafting, revision, and feedback processes, improving coherence, metacognition, and writing confidence, however, these benefits are accompanied by persistent concerns regarding ethical ambiguity, inconsistent policy guidance, and insufficient faculty training.
Samira Dichari, Fadi Jaber· Journal of Education and Tra...· 0 citations
The paper proposes a set of guiding principles derived from the identified tensions, emphasising teacher-mediated interaction, developmental calibration of AI use, transparency, curriculum alignment, privacy protection and equity considerations, which provide a structured basis for integrating AI in ways that support l...
It is suggested that effective teacher preparation must transcend content delivery and focus on equipping teachers with adaptive, student-centred methodologies grounded in cognitive science.
A. Al-Zahrani, Ghada Abdelhady· International Research Journ...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.