Skip to content
Review Open access

AI-Integrated Classroom Action Research for Enhancing Students' Critical Thinking Skills: A Systematic Review

Jul 2026 · ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review · 0 citations · 45 references

TL;DR

One of the first comprehensive syntheses of AI integration across the entire CAR cycle is offered, linking it explicitly to critical-thinking development within a reflective, teacher-led inquiry framework, an intersection that remains underexplored in the extant literature.

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has opened new opportunities for pedagogical innovation, including in the practice of Classroom Action Research (CAR). This study aims to analyze and synthesize how AI is integrated across the CAR cycle and to examine its contribution to the development of students' critical thinking skills. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Twenty peer-reviewed articles published between 2023 and 2026, retrieved from Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and ERIC, were analyzed through thematic categorization and narrative synthesis. AI is no longer positioned merely as an instructional tool; it is increasingly embedded across all stages of the CAR cycle, with the most prominent role emerging in the observation and reflection phases, where it supports learning data analysis and delivers rapid, adaptive feedback. AI integration is associated with improved student engagement and learning outcomes, as well as stronger analytical, evaluative, and argumentation skills. However, the benefits are not automatic: unstructured or excessive use of AI risks fostering dependency and reducing the depth of students' independent thinking. This review offers one of the first comprehensive syntheses of AI integration across the entire CAR cycle—planning, acting, observing, and reflecting—linking it explicitly to critical-thinking development within a reflective, teacher-led inquiry framework, an intersection that remains underexplored in the extant literature.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

From AI Adoption to Meaningful Learning: A Systematic Review of AI-Based Pedagogy, Student Engagement and Critical Thinking in Higher Education

The review proposes an AI–Pedagogy–Engagement–Critical Thinking (AI-PECT) framework in which AI capabilities influence educational outcomes through pedagogical mediation and learner agency, while AI literacy, teacher competence, infrastructure, assessment design and ethical governance operate as important contextual co...

Sonam Bansal and Vijay Kumar Lamba · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Instructors' and Students' Perceptions of AI-Supported Teaching and Learning in Technical-Vocational Education: A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic literature review investigates how instructors and students perceive and experience the implementation of AI-supported teaching and learning approaches in TVET settings and provides insights into emerging opportunities, challenges, and implications for policy and practice.

Iron G. Morales, John Hillard Mansueto, Russel M. Dela Torre · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

A systematic review of Design Thinking as a pedagogical strategy in higher education learning experiences

Design Thinking is conceptually broad and is often treated as a process, a mindset, a method, or a pedagogical framework, with no clear distinctions among them. This systematic review investigates whether Design Thinking (DT) is associated with learning experiences in higher education. The review examines how DT strate...

George Attah Aboagye, Kwame Fordjour Owusu, Emmanuel Aklasu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI in Education: fostering Critical Thinking or Promoting Dependency? / La IA generativa en la educación: ¿fomento del pensamiento crítico o fomento de la dependencia?

The findings show that GenAI supports critical thinking when embedded in structured learning activities that require students to question, evaluate, and revise AI-generated content, and highlight the importance of designing AI-supported learning environments that position AI outputs as objects of reasoning rather than...

C. Ngo · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Teaching Strategies for the Development of Critical Thinking in Educational Contexts: A Systematic Review

Critical thinking is an essential competency for addressing the challenges of contemporary education. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze the teaching strategies with the strongest scientific support for its development across different educational contexts. The study was conducted according to the P...

Violeta Chamaya Becerra, Juan Pedro Soplapuco Montalvo · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.