Jul 2026· Asian Research Journal of Mathematics· Vol 22, pp. 98-111· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is implied that AI-supported calculus instruction should be treated as a coordinated instructional system rather than a technology add-on if it is to contribute meaningfully to the U.S. STEM pipeline.
Abstract
This narrative review synthesises 20 studies on artificial intelligence (AI)-supported calculus instruction, focusing on the relationship between teacher preparation and student outcomes within U.S. STEM pipelines. The evidence suggests that AI tools, including intelligent tutoring systems, generative chatbots, and adaptive platforms, may support student engagement and, under guided instructional conditions, conceptual understanding and problem-solving. However, the findings indicate that these benefits are conditional on teacher guidance, pedagogical alignment, and active student use. The literature remains fragmented: studies of AI tools rarely examine teacher preparation, while studies of teacher readiness seldom measure student calculus outcomes. This review integrates these strands and proposes a cross-level framework linking AI design, teacher preparation, instructional implementation, and student achievement. It also identifies major gaps, including the predominance of small-scale studies, limited longitudinal evidence, limited attention to equity, and the absence of direct research on U.S. STEM pipeline outcomes. The proposed framework offers practical guidance for teacher preparation programmes and institutional policies. It suggests that professional development should focus on helping teachers interpret AI-generated feedback, design effective prompts, and align AI tools with conceptual learning goals. These findings imply that AI-supported calculus instruction should be treated as a coordinated instructional system rather than a technology add-on if it is to contribute meaningfully to the U.S. STEM pipeline.
It is argued that the teacher’s role in AI-based instruction is being reconfigured rather than diminished, offering implications for teacher professional development and the design of teacher-facing AI systems.
Evidence supports a pedagogy-first model in which AI augments rather than substitutes for teacher judgement, materials are grounded in curricular sources, outputs are verified, students are taught to interrogate AI responses, and use is age-appropriate and governed by clear data and accountability rules.
Nibedita Sarma· Asian Journal of Education a...· 0 citations
It is argued that AI can support motivation when system suggestions create opportunities for autonomous judgment, feedback and revision help students confirm their competence, and human-machine practice returns to authentic classroom communication in generative AI-supported college English classrooms.
Sha Li, Yuheng Sun· Advances in Educational Tech...· 0 citations
It is shown how mathematical creativity-aligned AI scaffolding can support teachers’ integrated engagement with mathematics and pedagogy in rural professional learning contexts where access to sustained professional development is limited.
Ali Bicer, Tugce Aldemir, Unggi Lee et al.· ZDM: Mathematics Education· 1 citation
This study examines how leadership mediates the use of tools such as ChatGPT in secondary-level writing instruction in a public Chilean school and concludes that equitable and meaningful integration of generative AI requires leadership that supports pedagogical intentionality, infrastructure development, and sustained...
The results suggest that the pedagogical behavior of AI tutors may not be easily steered through system prompts alone: embedding established SRL and CE frameworks did not produce detectable improvements on any preregistered outcome in a large, ecologically valid deployment.
Maximilian Georg Barth, Sverrir Thorgeirsson, K. Etemadi et al.· International Computing Educ...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.