Skip to content
Review Open access

Understanding Student Engagement in AI ‐Assisted Learning in Higher Education: The Roles of AI Support, Teacher Support and Flow

Jul 2026 · European Journal of Education · 0 citations · 37 references

TL;DR

The findings suggest that student engagement in AI‐assisted learning is linked not only to the availability of technological and interpersonal support, but also to the extent to which students experience learning as focused, absorbing and meaningful.

Abstract

With the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education, this study examined how AI support, teacher support and flow are associated with student engagement in AI‐assisted learning in higher education. Drawing on Self‐Determination Theory, a cross‐sectional survey was conducted with 677 university students from multiple institutions who had prior experience using AI‐enabled tools for learning. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling with AMOS 26.0 to examine the hypothesised relationships among the study variables. The results showed that AI support and teacher support were both positively associated with student engagement. In addition, both forms of support were positively associated with flow and flow was positively associated with engagement. Mediation analyses further indicated that flow mediated the associations between AI support and engagement and between teacher support and engagement. These findings suggest that student engagement in AI‐assisted learning is linked not only to the availability of technological and interpersonal support, but also to the extent to which students experience learning as focused, absorbing and meaningful. The study contributes to current research by integrating technological support, teacher support and experiential processes into a single framework for understanding engagement in AI‐assisted learning in higher education.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

AI-supported teaching and student engagement: the mediating role of perceived competence in vocational education

The findings suggest that competence-related experiences may represent an important psychological pathway linking AI-supported teaching and student engagement in structured vocational education contexts and the non-significant role of perceived autonomy indicates that motivational processes in AI-supported learning may...

Lin-Lin Yin, Yiwu Tang, Xiao-Yu Ou · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Student Engagement in AI ‐Supported Learning: Unpacking Psychological Drivers via Neural Network Analysis

The findings suggest that students' engagement in AI‐supported learning is associated not only with their beliefs about ability development, but also by their positive emotional experiences, which contributes to educational research by offering an integrated explanatory and predictive account of student engagement in A...

Xiaoning Wang, Zixian Hong, Wei Guo · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Understanding Student Dependency on AI: The Role of AI Literacy, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Resource Management Strategies

The skill-based dimensions of AI literacy were positively associated with AI dependency, whereas AI self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy were both negatively associated, suggesting a unified compensatory self-efficacy mechanism.

Hilit Maizel, Maya Kalman Halevi, Miriam Sarid et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
Open access Aug 2026

In-class AI usage and university students’ attitudes: The mediating role of perceived learning engagement benefits

The results suggest that the value of AI in classroom settings may relate not only to learning efficiency, but also to students’ learning experiences, particularly in terms of perceived cognitive and emotional engagement benefits.

Wen-Qiang Fan, Jiaqi Fang, Yan-Lin Sun et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Digital Competence and Learner Engagement in AI ‐Mediated Higher Education: A Mixed‐Methods Study of the Moderating Role of Cognitive Load in EFL Contexts

It is suggested that digital competence should not be understood as a stand‐alone predictor of engagement, but as a conditional educational resource whose value depends on learners' ability to regulate cognitive load in AI‐mediated learning contexts.

Jiachen Zhang, Si-Yi Wang · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.