The review highlights the need for transparent institutional policies, educator training, ethical AI literacy, strong data governance frameworks, and equitable digital infrastructure to support the responsible, ethical, and inclusive integration of generative AI technologies in education.
Abstract
This systematic literature review examines the ethical challenges associated with integrating generative chatbots in educational contexts. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework, the review synthesised peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical studies published between 2022 and 2025 and retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science. Following systematic screening and eligibility assessment, 16 studies were included in the final synthesis. The findings identified four primary ethical domains: student data privacy and protection; academic integrity and AI-assisted plagiarism; algorithmic bias and fairness; and institutional governance and policy readiness. While generative chatbots offer significant pedagogical benefits, including personalised learning, enhanced feedback, and expanded access to educational support, their unregulated use may exacerbate digital inequalities, compromise educational integrity, and reinforce existing biases. The review highlights the need for transparent institutional policies, educator training, ethical AI literacy, strong data governance frameworks, and equitable digital infrastructure. These measures are essential to support the responsible, ethical, and inclusive integration of generative AI technologies in education.
The findings indicate that GenAI adoption in African HEIs is expanding but uneven, concentrated in digitally advanced nations, enhancing personalization, multilingual learning, and research productivity, yet raises ethical concerns about academic integrity.
O. Apata, Peter Oyewole, S. Ajose et al.· Journal of University Teachi...· 1 citation
The findings reveal that current discussions on GAI in education are largely characterized by retrospective and crisis-driven ethical framings, predominantly focused on risks such as plagiarism, bias, and misinformation, while offering limited engagement with proactive, context-sensitive strategies aligned with SDG 4.
Eva García-Beltrán· Journal of Educational Techn...· 0 citations
This systematic review synthesises empirical and conceptual evidence on university pedagogical practices that cultivate critical thinking and, through it, student intellectual autonomy in digitally mediated learning environments and identifies gaps concerning long-term transfer, equity, and the assessment of autonomy i...
Mayra Carolina Márquez López, Daniela Guardo Rua, Hugo Leonardo Gómez Hernández et al.· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
This literature review examines the opportunities, implementation challenges, ethical implications, and emerging directions of predictive learning analytics (PLA) in engineering education. Using a structured review of the literature, the study synthesizes evidence from several publications with emphasis on studies exam...
Hamza Abu Owida, Areen M. Arabiat· International Journal of Eva...· 0 citations
The article introduces Mirʾāh, a synthesized ethical framework of seven principles for transparent adaptive learning organized in a three tier governance architecture, a Foundation tier in which transparency and contestability create trustworthy interaction, and an Empowerment tier in which educational integrity and AI...
Hesham Mahmoud· Crossroads of Social Inquiry· 0 citations
The study develops an integrative framework that connects Tri-Center Education, character education, digital citizenship, AI ethics, and Social Studies learning as a foundation for strengthening students' digital ethics.
Ida Karim Ustawun Khasanah, Yanuar Bagas Arwansyah, Victor Novianto· International Conference on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.