Aug 2026· Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice· 1 citation
TL;DR
The findings indicate that GenAI adoption in African HEIs is expanding but uneven, concentrated in digitally advanced nations, enhancing personalization, multilingual learning, and research productivity, yet raises ethical concerns about academic integrity.
Abstract
Despite Generative AI (GenAI) is transforming higher education globally, its implications for access, inclusion, personalized learning, assessment, and research productivity in African higher education institutions (HEIs) remain underexplored. This review synthesizes empirical evidence on how African HEIs are adopting GenAI, highlighting key opportunities, ethical challenges, and levels of institutional preparedness. We searched six academic databases, including Education Source Ultimate, Web of Science, Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, APA PsycINFO, and Humanities Search Ultimate for peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers published in English between 2022 and 2025. Out of the 110 records, 82 were screened after 28 duplicates were removed. We conducted full-text reviews on 51 eligible articles and 39 met the inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that GenAI adoption in African HEIs is expanding but uneven, concentrated in digitally advanced nations, enhancing personalization, multilingual learning, and research productivity, yet raises ethical concerns about academic integrity. We recommend that institutions integrate GenAI literacy into faculty development and curricula and that policymakers prioritise governance frameworks that balance innovation and ethics.
It is found that GenAI adoption is high globally, and is growing rapidly across Africa, but that structural constraints, including limited infrastructure, low AI literacy, and underdeveloped institutional policy, shape a distinctly African pattern of opportunity and risk that global adoption figures obscure.
S. Opoku· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that GenAI can effectively improve teaching efficacy, enable personalised learning experiences, and streamline assessment procedures, however, its implementation also draws attention to concerns regarding academic integrity, data privacy, algorithmic bias, and ethical governance.
Xi Bi· Exploring Science Academic C...· 0 citations
The review highlights the need for transparent institutional policies, educator training, ethical AI literacy, strong data governance frameworks, and equitable digital infrastructure to support the responsible, ethical, and inclusive integration of generative AI technologies in education.
The findings reveal that current discussions on GAI in education are largely characterized by retrospective and crisis-driven ethical framings, predominantly focused on risks such as plagiarism, bias, and misinformation, while offering limited engagement with proactive, context-sensitive strategies aligned with SDG 4.
Eva García-Beltrán· Journal of Educational Techn...· 0 citations
A conceptual framework offering AI designers, teacher educators, and policymakers a psychologically grounded, empirically mapped, and internationally contextualised basis for developing AI-supported educational systems that advance equity, learner engagement, and meaningful educational transformation is proposed.
Arpana Koul· Review of Artificial Intelli...· 0 citations
This study provides a narrative review of contemporary challenges in teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in higher education across diverse international contexts. It synthesizes evidence from peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025. The analysis identifies six interrelated domains of difficulty:...