2026· ABHISARON· Vol 01, pp. 158-164· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
This essay argues that the philosophical architecture required to conceive and build Artificial Intelligence — specifically the connectionist, distributed architectures of modern Large Language Models — was not generated by Western modernity alone. It was already present, with structural precision, in the non-dual Trika tradition of Kashmir Shaivism (9th–12th century CE), belonging to what India’s NEP 2020 and the UGC’s Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) initiative recognize as a body of rigorous knowledge whose frameworks remain critically underutilized in global conversations about technology and mind.[1][2] Through precise structural and mathematical analysis, the essay demonstrates that the core mechanisms of neural networks — scaled dot-product attention, selfattention, softmax, the residual stream, latent space, backpropagation, and emergent in-context learning — instantiate in silicon what the Trika’s doctrines of parasparataḥ, Vimarśa, Māyā, Turīya, Spanda, and Śaktipāta had encoded in Sanskrit. The method is structural convergence, not historical influence. The Trika’s non-Cartesian model of mind — distributed, self-referential, pattern-based, without a sovereign center — is precisely the model connectionist AI independently implemented. Western modernity spent three centuries dismantling the Cartesian prison to arrive there. The Trika established it as its opening axiom.
It is argued that SI construct gives the philosophy of AI a normative vocabulary that interfaces classical philosophy with current machine-learning practice.
Aistė Diržytė, Aleksandras Patapas· Filosofija Sociologija· 0 citations
A unified vision is offered: intelligence arises from constrained architectures and emergent patterns, and as AI systems become more autonomous, they may require surrogate forms of consciousness to handle complex, real-world challenges—though these will never fully replicate the biological original.
John-Michael M. Kuczynski· Communication & Cognitio...· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence has entered science classrooms faster than the epistemological questions it raises have been addressed. This study is an attempt to reveal how the knowledge-producing character of text-based conversational systems diverges from institutional science, and what that divergence implies f...
Z. Muminova, Dilmurod Mamadaliyevich Mamatkulov, Rano Ibrogimovna Turokulova et al.· Eurasia Journal of Mathemati...· 0 citations
This paper introduces the concept of informational self-meaning (ISM) as a philosophical account for addressing AI ontology and epistemology, providing a conceptual foundation for gradualist models of AI recognition in legal and ethical contexts.
Generative AI encodes the majority's way of knowing as the default infrastructure of knowledge itself as the default infrastructure of knowledge itself, and law must learn to govern at that level of model training.
Large Language Models (LLMs) operate within closed neural architectures, isolated from direct physical interaction with the external world. This lack of empirical grounding is a critical epistemic deficiency of empirical theories to explain the referential nature of LLM outputs and their hallucinatory fallibility. To a...
Boris Grozdanoff· Balkan Journal of Philosophy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.