Skip to content
Open access

The Non-Cartesian Mind: Indian Knowledge Systems, Kashmir Shaiva Philosophy, and the Structural Convergence with Neural Network Architecture

2026 · ABHISARON · Vol 01, pp. 158-164 · 0 citations · 16 references

Abstract

This essay argues that the philosophical architecture required to conceive and build Artificial Intelligence — specifically the connectionist, distributed architectures of modern Large Language Models — was not generated by Western modernity alone. It was already present, with structural precision, in the non-dual Trika tradition of Kashmir Shaivism (9th–12th century CE), belonging to what India’s NEP 2020 and the UGC’s Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) initiative recognize as a body of rigorous knowledge whose frameworks remain critically underutilized in global conversations about technology and mind.[1][2] Through precise structural and mathematical analysis, the essay demonstrates that the core mechanisms of neural networks — scaled dot-product attention, selfattention, softmax, the residual stream, latent space, backpropagation, and emergent in-context learning — instantiate in silicon what the Trika’s doctrines of parasparataḥ, Vimarśa, Māyā, Turīya, Spanda, and Śaktipāta had encoded in Sanskrit. The method is structural convergence, not historical influence. The Trika’s non-Cartesian model of mind — distributed, self-referential, pattern-based, without a sovereign center — is precisely the model connectionist AI independently implemented. Western modernity spent three centuries dismantling the Cartesian prison to arrive there. The Trika established it as its opening axiom.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

Can Artificial Intelligence be Socratic?

It is argued that SI construct gives the philosophy of AI a normative vocabulary that interfaces classical philosophy with current machine-learning practice.

Aistė Diržytė, Aleksandras Patapas · 0 citations
Sep 2026

ON AI AND SOME PHILOSOPHICAL CHALLENGES

A unified vision is offered: intelligence arises from constrained architectures and emergent patterns, and as AI systems become more autonomous, they may require surrogate forms of consciousness to handle complex, real-world challenges—though these will never fully replicate the biological original.

John-Michael M. Kuczynski · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

The nature of science in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Epistemic authority, materiality, and a synergetic response

Generative artificial intelligence has entered science classrooms faster than the epistemological questions it raises have been addressed. This study is an attempt to reveal how the knowledge-producing character of text-based conversational systems diverges from institutional science, and what that divergence implies f...

Z. Muminova, Dilmurod Mamadaliyevich Mamatkulov, Rano Ibrogimovna Turokulova et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Informational self meaning as a structural theory in artificial intelligence ontology and epistemology

This paper introduces the concept of informational self-meaning (ISM) as a philosophical account for addressing AI ontology and epistemology, providing a conceptual foundation for gradualist models of AI recognition in legal and ethical contexts.

Jae-Eung Yu · 0 citations
Open access 2026

How Are Large Language Models Fallible

Large Language Models (LLMs) operate within closed neural architectures, isolated from direct physical interaction with the external world. This lack of empirical grounding is a critical epistemic deficiency of empirical theories to explain the referential nature of LLM outputs and their hallucinatory fallibility. To a...

Boris Grozdanoff · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.